Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FTP Synchronizer VS Tux Commander

Compare FTP Synchronizer VS Tux Commander and see what are their differences

FTP Synchronizer logo FTP Synchronizer

Secure and high performance FTP File Sync product

Tux Commander logo Tux Commander

Tux Commander Homepage, an opensource GTK2 file manager
  • FTP Synchronizer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-20
  • Tux Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-28

FTP Synchronizer features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    FTP Synchronizer offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to set up and manage FTP synchronization tasks without requiring advanced technical skills.
  • Automated Synchronization
    The tool supports scheduled and real-time synchronization, allowing users to automate file transfers and ensure their directories are consistently up-to-date.
  • Multi-Protocol Support
    FTP Synchronizer supports various protocols, including FTP, SFTP, and FTPS, ensuring compatibility with different server configurations and security requirements.
  • Conflict Detection and Resolution
    The software can detect file conflicts and offers options for resolving them, such as overwriting or renaming files based on user preferences.
  • Detailed Logging
    Users have access to comprehensive logs that provide insights into synchronization activities, helping them troubleshoot issues and maintain transparency.

Possible disadvantages of FTP Synchronizer

  • Limited Platform Availability
    FTP Synchronizer is primarily available for Windows, which may limit its usage for users needing a cross-platform solution compatible with macOS or Linux.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are straightforward, some advanced functionality may require a learning curve for users unfamiliar with networking and synchronization concepts.
  • Cost
    FTP Synchronizer is a paid software, which might be a drawback for users or organizations with tight budgets seeking free alternatives.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    As an FTP-based tool, it depends heavily on stable internet connectivity, which can affect performance and reliability during synchronization tasks.
  • Potential Security Risks
    While it supports secure protocols like SFTP and FTPS, misconfigurations or security oversights could still pose risks when transferring sensitive data over FTP.

Tux Commander features and specs

  • Open Source
    Tux Commander is free to use and modify, allowing users access to its source code, which promotes transparency and community-driven improvements.
  • Dual Panel Interface
    It features a dual-panel interface that enhances file management efficiency by allowing users to view and manage files from two folders simultaneously.
  • Plugin Support
    Its architecture supports plugins which extend its functionality, making it adaptable to different user needs.
  • Lightweight
    Tux Commander is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on less powerful hardware.
  • Familiar GUI
    The graphical user interface is intuitive and similar to other file managers, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of Tux Commander

  • Limited Development
    The software has seen slower development progress in recent years, which may lead to issues with compatibility with newer systems or lack of new features.
  • Linux Exclusive
    Tux Commander is designed specifically for Linux, limiting its availability and usefulness on other operating systems like Windows or macOS.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to some modern file managers, it lacks advanced features such as integrated cloud storage support and advanced search functionalities.
  • Potentially Outdated Interface
    Its user interface may feel dated compared to more modern file management solutions, which could affect user experience.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FTP Synchronizer and Tux Commander)
File Manager
82 82%
18% 18
FTP Client
82 82%
18% 18
File Management
90 90%
10% 10
File Explorer
51 51%
49% 49

User comments

Share your experience with using FTP Synchronizer and Tux Commander. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tux Commander seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FTP Synchronizer mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FTP Synchronizer yet. Tracking of FTP Synchronizer recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Tux Commander mentions (1)

  • One Commander – a new Windows 10 file browser
    If you want OSS alternatives for Linux, here are some. A few may look old and unpolished, but today pretty much every desktop environment comes with its own file manager. https://www.4pane.co.uk/ https://doublecmd.sourceforge.io/ https://ignorantguru.github.io/spacefm/ http://tuxcmd.sourceforge.net/ http://www.boomerangsworld.de/cms/worker/ http://roland65.free.fr/xfe/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FTP Synchronizer and Tux Commander, you can also consider the following products

xfdesktop - The xfdesktop application manages the desktop backdrop.

GNOME Commander - GNOME Commander is a "two-pane" graphical file manager for the GNOME desktop environment.

Rodent - Rodent is a project file manager for browsers; it helps you organize your work without saving files locally.

Polo File Manager - Software for Linux

CLEX - CLEX is a command-line interface-based file manager for managing and editing project files, no matter where they are stored.

cryo - A visual file manager