Tutanota VS BrowserLeaks.com

Tutanota Reviews

1. Scotty    

   Analyst at Beta-Test Solutions | over 3 years ago
   Excellent application for free

   Great app for a free service. Standard security features. Hosted in Germany.

   🏁 Competitors: ProtonMail, Yandex.Mail, Microsoft Outlook

   👍 Pros:    Free basic plan|Data protection and security|Well designed

   👎 Cons:    Nothing, so far

BrowserLeaks.com Reviews

Tutanota mentions (177)

• Please move away from Amazon for Tuta's Domain Name System

  A look at tuta.com and tutanota.com demonstrates that Tuta is using an Amazon Start of Authority (SOA) DNS record and 4 corresponding Amazon Name Server (NS) DNS records. Source: 5 months ago

• Is there a place to suggest software you'd like to be on the AUR? If not, let it be here!

  I've moved on to Ferdium by the way via the ferdium-electron AUR package. I also use Tuta, Skiff, Google Messages and YouTube Music with it. Source: 5 months ago

• Can't access new website

  Unfortunately, since you launched the new tuta.com website, I can't access anymore from China, unless I have a VPN service. Source: 5 months ago

• Change current email from Tutanota to tuta

  Have a non business paid account. Can you change your current tutanota.com email to the tuta.com email? Source: 5 months ago

• troubles after tutanota became tuta..now cannot log in

  Weeks ago when tutanota became tuta I had same issues...wouldnt allow me log in. I clicked links provided by tuta to "migrate" data...never worked. Few days later...i was able to log in at https://mail.tutanota.com/login and continued until today, when my credentials were not "valid" anymore so tried at tuta.com and same thing. Source: 5 months ago

BrowserLeaks.com mentions (112)

• The /unblock API from Browserless: dodging bot detection as a service

  I'm sure that happens, but I haven't done any work with gyro data myself. There's similar logic for mouse cursor movements, there are libraries out there that will generate a natural looking curve that moves the cursor from one position to another, with imperfections that emulate human hand movement. > Why do we even need an actual device? We can emulate if we even need to and set our headers to look like we're... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• The confusing CalyxOS-supplied Chromium

  WebRTC Leak Test by BrowserLeaks. With WebRTC turned off, as it is by default in Cromite and CalyxOS Chromium, this site returns "No Leak". With Chrome, or with WebRTC turned on (possible via the site settings, which has an address bar shortcut), more information is exposed. Source: 5 months ago

• How do I make a bare account without automatically getting suspended?

  -- *Facebook is intrusive. You may need to make some adjustments to your browser settings and add some privacy extensions to stop browser fingerprinting and leaks. Source: 5 months ago

• Setting proxy doesn't work in Quitebrowser, but it works in Firefox.

  :set content.proxy socks://127.0.0.1:1055 doesn't work in Qutebrowser for me, and I can't figure out why. What's even more baffling, to me, is that https://browserleaks.com does work, but no other website would work. Source: 9 months ago

• Unveiling WebRTC Vulnerabilities: Security Measures in the Finance Industry

  In conclusion, the finance industry must take extra precautions to mitigate webRTC vulnerabilities and ensure a secure online environment for its customers. ClonBrowser and browserleaks.com are both excellent tools that can be utilized to achieve this goal. By staying one step ahead of online threats, we can fully realize the potential of webRTC technology while keeping our data safe and secure. Source: 10 months ago