Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Turborepo VS React.run

Compare Turborepo VS React.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Turborepo logo Turborepo

Welcome to the Turborepo documentation!

React.run logo React.run

Quick in-browser prototyping for React Components!
  • Turborepo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-10-04
  • React.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-11

Turborepo features and specs

  • Performance Optimization
    Turborepo optimizes the build process by caching computations and determining what needs to be rebuilt, speeding up development times significantly.
  • Monorepo Support
    It provides strong support for monorepos, making it easier to manage multiple packages within a single repository with shared dependencies and configuration.
  • Incremental Builds
    By using incremental builds, Turborepo only rebuilds the parts of your code that have changed, minimizing build times and improving efficiency.
  • Parallel Execution
    Tasks can be executed in parallel when possible, taking full advantage of multi-core processors to further speed up the build process.
  • Developer Experience
    Turborepo provides an easy and intuitive interface for developers, with clear documentation and robust configuration options that enhance productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Turborepo

  • Complex Configuration for Beginners
    While powerful, Turborepo’s configurations can be overwhelming and complex for developers who are new to the concept of monorepos or build optimization.
  • Limited Integration Options
    There may be limited integration options with some tools or services, requiring extra effort to set up custom workflows.
  • Resource Overhead
    The optimization and caching strategies used by Turborepo can result in additional resource usage on the development machine, which might be a concern for some developers.
  • Learning Curve
    Adopting Turborepo can require a learning curve, as developers need to familiarize themselves with its specific ecosystem and tooling.

React.run features and specs

  • Simplified Setup
    React.run provides a streamlined and efficient setup for starting new React projects, minimizing the initial configuration time.
  • Pre-configured Environment
    It comes with a pre-configured environment that includes essential tools and libraries, reducing the need for additional setup and compatibility checks.
  • Boost developer productivity
    By automating much of the setup process, React.run allows developers to focus more on coding and less on configuring their development environment.
  • Consistency
    Ensures a standardized environment across different projects, which can be particularly beneficial for teams and large-scale applications.
  • Community Support
    Being an officially supported tool, it benefits from strong community support and timely updates from the React team.

Possible disadvantages of React.run

  • Limited Flexibility
    The pre-configured setup may not suit all project requirements, and making customizations can sometimes be challenging or require additional steps.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to React.run might face a learning curve as they adapt to the specific configurations and conventions used by the tool.
  • Dependency on Tool
    Relying heavily on React.run can create dependency, making it harder to switch to different tools or configurations if needed in the future.
  • Updates and Compatibility
    Although it receives updates, there's always a risk that a new version might introduce breaking changes or compatibility issues with existing projects.
  • Potential Overhead
    The inclusion of tools and libraries that may not be necessary for all projects can potentially add overhead and bloat to the development environment.

Turborepo videos

Monorepos - How the Pros Scale Huge Software Projects // Turborepo vs Nx

More videos:

  • Review - How many apps can you build in one Turborepo?

React.run videos

No React.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Turborepo and React.run)
Front End Package Manager
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Turborepo and React.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, React.run seems to be a lot more popular than Turborepo. While we know about 187 links to React.run, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Turborepo. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Turborepo mentions (2)

  • [Part 1] Build a CLI tool: Setup the tsonfig.json
    The difference is the way I am importing the extends . Since my setup is a monorepo, I would now have to add @repo/typescript-config as dependency in package.json. Read more about Turborepo. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Starting the Console front-end for Rainbow Platform
    For dependency and workflow management in Gaia, we can use any tool available in the Node ecosystem. You might suggest Lerna or even Turborepo. For our needs, the default npm workspaces will suffice. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

React.run mentions (187)

  • You should know this before choosing Next.js
    [2] https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • CVE-2025-29927 – Next.js
    > What do you get out of Next.js over vanilla React? The biggest problem is that React itself recommends against using Vanilla React. https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app > If you want to build a new app or website with React, we recommend starting with a framework. This, frankly, is insane. The whole point of React was that it was this relatively lightweight UI library you could drop into pretty much any... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • How much traffic can a pre-rendered Next.js site handle?
    I think people reasonably expect, say, an aws lambda to be aws specific. That's a very different story to React, which is supposed to be a library for general application ui development, and the official react documentation recommending Next as the way to use it. https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Sunsetting Create React App
    Interestingly, the Creating a React App page (https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app) does not mention Remix. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    The Getting Started docs recommend against using vanilla React and nudge you towards NextJS and similar frameworks because you're gonna end up needing that stuff eventually https://react.dev/learn/start-a-new-react-project So new projects have to actively not follow the recommended approach in the docs if they want to use vanilla React. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Turborepo and React.run, you can also consider the following products

Rush Monorepo - Rush is a monorepo manager for JavaScript developers, aiding in creating and publishing multiple packages from a shared Git repository.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Lerna - Application and Data, Libraries, and Javascript Utilities & Libraries

Vite - Next Generation Frontend Tooling

Yarn - Yarn is a package manager for your code.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps