No features have been listed yet.
No Trunk.io Check videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, mypy seems to be a lot more popular than Trunk.io Check. While we know about 50 links to mypy, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Trunk.io Check. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Unfortunately, the best solution, according to this blog post, is, surprise, surprise, to subscribe to their product (which also encourages devs to embrace brain-dead practices like empty commit messages and squash-merges, which gives me little faith in their product, but I digress). So I guess those of us who can't or won't cough up a subscription fee are just hosed. Source: over 2 years ago
I would say any styleguide that is in prose form and not machine enforced is deficient. Modern linting and formatting tools are the best, most efficeiect means for enforcing style. No religious arguments are needed if the tooling decides what is correct. Shameless plug for https://trunk.io/products/check - which will handle universal enforcement of all the tooling for all of the pieces of your tech stack. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I actually recently joined a startup working on this problem! One of our products is a universal linter, which wraps the standard open-source tools available for the different toolchains, simplifies the setup/installation process for all of them, and a bunch of other usability things (suppressing existing issues so that you can introduce new linters with minimal pain, CI integration, and more): you can read more... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I've always admired many of Java's features, but let's not act like the reason for using Java for scripting is the pitfalls of Python. It's just because of an underlying preference for Java. 1. https://mypy-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I’m not here to tell people which languages they should love. But if you do find yourself writing production code in a dynamically typed language like Python, Ruby, or JavaScript, I would give serious consideration to opting into the type-checking tools that have become available in those ecosystems. In Python, consider requiring type hints and adding mypy checks to your CI to move your type safety bugs forward... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Mypy is "an optional static type checker for Python that aims to combine the benefits of dynamic (or "duck") typing and static typing". As Python is dynamically typed, Mypy adds an extra layer of safety by checking types at compile time (based on type annotations conforming to PEP 484), catching potential errors before runtime. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Mypy stands as an essential static type-checking tool. Its primary function is to verify the correctness of types in your codebase. However, manually annotating types in legacy code can be laborious and time-consuming. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lua is a great language for embedding, but one thing I wish it had was some form of optional type annotations that could be checked by a linter. Something like mypy for Lua would be super-useful. Source: almost 2 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
PyLint - Pylint is a Python source code analyzer which looks for programming errors.
flake8 - A wrapper around Python tools to check the style and quality of Python code.
PyChecker - Python source code checking tool.
PEP8 - pep8 is a tool to check your Python code against some of the style conventions in PEP 8.
PyFlakes - A simple program which checks Python source files for errors.