Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Trix VS PocketBlocks

Compare Trix VS PocketBlocks and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Trix logo Trix

A rich text editor for everyday writing.

PocketBlocks logo PocketBlocks

In PocketBlocks, all you need to do is drag and drop pre-built or self-customized components onto the What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) canvas to make an app, PocketBlocks helps you build an app quickly and focus on the business logic.
  • Trix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-01
  • PocketBlocks Branding
    Branding //
    2024-05-21
  • PocketBlocks App Editor
    App Editor //
    2024-05-21

Openblocks + PocketBase = PocketBlocks.

PocketBlocks is an integration between Openblocks and PocketBase.

Traditionally, building an internal app requires complex frontend and backend interactions with hundreds and thousands of lines of code, not to mention work on packaging, integration, and deployment. PocketBlocks significantly reduces the work you need to do to build an app.

In PocketBlocks, all you need to do is drag and drop pre-built or self-customized components onto the What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) canvas, PocketBlocks helps you build an app quickly and focus on business logic.

Why choose PocketBlocks? Open source: Makes your ideas more feasible. High scalability: Allows you to execute JavaScript almost anywhere you would like to customize your business processes and UI components. Clean design: Follows the principles of Ant Design and supports display on screens of different sizes. We have a number of UI components, based on which you can freely build a dashboard, admin panel, and content management system (CMS).

Trix features and specs

  • User-friendly interface
    Trix offers a simple and clean interface that is easy to navigate for users of various skill levels, making it an accessible tool for content creation.
  • Rich text features
    The editor supports a variety of formatting options, including bold, italic, lists, links, and embedded content, providing flexibility in how text and media are presented.
  • Embedded multimedia
    Users can seamlessly insert images, videos, and other multimedia content directly into the text, enhancing the overall interactivity and engagement of the content.
  • Cross-browser compatibility
    Trix is designed to work consistently across different browsers, ensuring that the editing experience is uniform and reliable no matter what browser is being used.
  • Simplicity in integration
    Integrating Trix into web applications is straightforward with minimal configuration, reducing the time and effort required for setup.
  • Open-source
    As an open-source project, Trix allows developers to contribute to its improvement and adapt the software to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Trix

  • Limited customization
    While Trix is straightforward to use, it offers fewer customization options compared to other rich text editors, which may limit its adaptability for certain advanced use cases.
  • Basic feature set
    Some users might find Trix lacking in advanced features such as collaborative editing, markdown support, or real-time spell checking, which are available in other editors.
  • Dependency on server for processing
    Trix relies on server-side processing for embedding and saving data, which might increase complexity in terms of server configuration and handling.
  • Incomplete documentation
    While there is a documentation available, it may not cover all aspects or use cases in detail, potentially causing difficulties for developers during implementation.
  • Performance with large documents
    Trix can sometimes struggle with performance issues when handling very large documents, affecting the user experience during editing sessions.

PocketBlocks features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Trix

Overall verdict

  • Trix is a good choice if you're looking for a lightweight, easy-to-implement text editor that provides the essential features needed for most text editing tasks. However, if you require more advanced functionalities or extensive customization, you might need to consider other alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Trix is a popular rich text editor that is valued for its simple integration, minimal design, and ease of use. It offers the basic features required for text editing without overwhelming users with too many options, making it suitable for personal blogs, content management systems, and note-taking applications. Its user-friendly interface and clean output make it ideal for projects that require straightforward text editing capabilities.

Recommended for

    Developers and users who need a simple, effective rich text editor that integrates easily into web applications, and who require a no-frills tool for typical text formatting tasks. It's particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized web projects where simplicity and functionality are top priorities.

Trix videos

+ Add

Trix has Fruity Shapes, AGAIN!

More videos:

  • Review - Classic Trix VS Trix
  • Review - Trix Trux Review: Does it Work? | As Seen on TV

PocketBlocks videos

No PocketBlocks videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Trix and PocketBlocks)

Trix

PocketBlocks

Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Rich Text Editor
100 100%
Rich Text Editor
0% 0
No Code
0 0%
No Code
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Trix and PocketBlocks.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

PocketBlocks's answer:

Open source: Makes your ideas more feasible. High scalability: Allows you to execute JavaScript almost anywhere you would like to customize your business processes and UI components. Clean design: Follows the principles of Ant Design and supports display on screens of different sizes. We have a number of UI components, based on which you can freely build a dashboard, admin panel, and content management system (CMS).

What makes your product unique?

PocketBlocks's answer:

An entire low-code platform within a single binary.

How would you describe your primary audience?

PocketBlocks's answer:

Developer who needs a platform to create internal tools.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

PocketBlocks's answer:

Golang, Typescript, SQLite.

User comments

Share your experience with using Trix and PocketBlocks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Trix and PocketBlocks

Trix Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
If you want something different for a change, with the basic functionalities of a web editor, Trix can be a pick. The project describes that it is built for the modern web.
Source: itsfoss.com

PocketBlocks Reviews

We have no reviews of PocketBlocks yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Trix seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Trix mentions (14)

  • Word-like HTML inline edit with design mode
    I love how Trix [0] and (I think) ProseMirror [1] work in that regard: it does use contenteditable, but every edit you make is applied to an internal model instead, then the editor state is updated back from the model. [0]: https://trix-editor.org/ [1]: https://prosemirror.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Testing ViewComponent w/ Capybara
    💡 If you're using the Trix editor, I also show you how to test your view components with a nice helper inspired by Will Olson's article Testing the Trix Editor with Capybara and MiniTest. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Quill – Your powerful rich text editor
    Trix is simple and easy to use for basic writing like a blog. It’s what Basecamp and HEY both use (it was built by 37signals and is the default in Rails) https://trix-editor.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • WYSIWYG editor for a new Rails project
    Trix was the winner. It was easy to style, is well maintained, has documentation for embedding it into a form, is easy to create custom keyboard shortcuts for, has great examples on how to save/load content or modify it with javascript. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How to use Cloudflare R2 with Ruby on Rails Active Storage
    In some case, you may need to allow the user to upload the file in the text editor like Trix editor. However, you current configuration not allowed it, you need to configure the CORS. Here the configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

PocketBlocks mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PocketBlocks yet. Tracking of PocketBlocks recommendations started around May 2024.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Trix and PocketBlocks, you can also consider the following products

Cleartext - A text editor that allows only the 1,000 most common words

ToolJet - Open-source alternative for Retool

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Appsmith - Appsmith is an open source web framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards, and workflows.

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Budibase - What Wordpress is to websites, Budibase is to web apps. Budibase is a free and open source web app builder for creating, launching and growing web applications. Budibase eliminates repetition and dramatically reduces development time. Check it out.

Loading...