Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

total.js VS Apache Wicket

Compare total.js VS Apache Wicket and see what are their differences

total.js logo total.js

Free web application framework for building Web sites and Web applications using JavaScript, HTML...

Apache Wicket logo Apache Wicket

HelloWorld demonstrates the basic structure of a web application in Wicket. A Label component is used to display a message on the home page for the application. In all the Wicket examples, you have to put all files in the same package directory.
  • total.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-21
  • Apache Wicket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22

total.js features and specs

  • Performance
    Total.js is known for its high performance due to its non-blocking architecture, making it suitable for real-time applications.
  • Full-stack Framework
    Provides a full-stack environment, allowing developers to build applications with all necessary functionalities directly supported by the framework.
  • Easy Setup
    The framework offers a simple setup process and straightforward project structure, making it accessible for developers of various skill levels.
  • Modular Architecture
    Total.js supports modular architecture, enabling developers to separate logic into different modules, which enhances maintainability and scalability.
  • Rich Documentation
    Includes comprehensive and well-organized documentation, which makes learning and troubleshooting more straightforward for developers.

Possible disadvantages of total.js

  • Community Size
    Relatively small community compared to more popular frameworks like Express.js or Angular, which can result in less third-party support and resources.
  • Less Popularity
    Total.js is not as widely used as other frameworks, potentially leading to less frequent updates and fewer integration options with other tools.
  • Limited Middleware
    While Total.js supports middleware, its ecosystem isn't as extensive as that of some other popular Node.js frameworks, potentially limiting flexibility.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers who are accustomed to more traditional Node.js frameworks might experience a learning curve adapting to the Total.js way of handling tasks.

Apache Wicket features and specs

  • Component-based architecture
    Apache Wicket follows a component-based architecture, allowing developers to create reusable components that can be easily maintained and improved over time.
  • POJO-driven development
    Wicket promotes Plain Old Java Object (POJO) development, which simplifies the creation of web applications by reducing the need for extensive XML configurations and boosting productivity with familiar Java paradigms.
  • HTML-centric design
    The framework allows developers to start with pure HTML and then add dynamic behavior, leading to cleaner separation of concerns and easier markup manipulation.
  • Strong type checking
    Wicket provides strong type checking at compile time, which leads to fewer runtime errors and increases code safety and reliability.
  • Built-in AJAX support
    Wicket seamlessly integrates AJAX functionality, allowing developers to create rich internet applications with minimal effort.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Wicket

  • Steep learning curve
    The component-based approach and the specific conventions used in Wicket might require a significant learning period, especially for those who are new to component-driven web frameworks.
  • Less popularity
    Although Wicket has a dedicated community, it is not as widely adopted as some other Java web frameworks, which might result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations.
  • Statefulness
    Wicket's stateful nature can lead to increased memory usage and potentially slower performance compared to stateless web frameworks, which might be important for applications with a large number of concurrent users.
  • Complexity in large applications
    As the size and scope of a Wicket application grow, the complexity of managing components and their interactions can also increase, making it harder to maintain without careful planning and architecture.

total.js videos

Node.js: First steps with Total.js framework

Apache Wicket videos

Apache wicket: 1 start

More videos:

  • Review - Apache wicket: 12 LifeCycle

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to total.js and Apache Wicket)
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
46 46%
54% 54
Developer Tools
17 17%
83% 83

User comments

Share your experience with using total.js and Apache Wicket. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare total.js and Apache Wicket

total.js Reviews

Top 14 Node.JS Frameworks: Which Will Rule in 2020?
By now, the Total.js group has spent some effort on trying to acquire super-premium sponsors for going alongside them. This signifies that they are planning to maximize and adding extra features.

Apache Wicket Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
Tapestry is a component-based Java framework with which you can create scalable web applications. Its focus on reusable components makes it architecturally similar to Jakarta Faces and Apache Wicket (see both above). Like Struts and Wicket, Tapestry is also a project of the Apache Software Foundation.
Source: raygun.com
10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
Apache Wicket is a component-based application development framework developed by Jonathan Locke. It is one of the most recently developed Java frameworks.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Wicket should be more popular than total.js. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

total.js mentions (2)

  • How to Use MySQL Database in Total.js with QueryBuilderMySQL?
    Total.js, a powerful web framework for Node.js, simplifies web application development. Integrating databases like MySQL is crucial for building dynamic applications. In this tutorial, we'll explore how to seamlessly combine MySQL with __ Total.js__ using QueryBuilderMySQL. This intuitive tool streamlines database interactions, making it ideal for both beginners and experienced developers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • File storage microservice for your Express.js Application
    Bringing total4 is a very bad idea, Total.js is an independent framework for web development. Bringing the entire Total.js framework into another framework (Express) is working fine but this is not a good practice. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Apache Wicket mentions (10)

  • Show HN: Latudio – a language acquisition app with a listening-oriented approach
    - like Sentences exercise, but you can select your own set of sentences. You can also set goals and view statistics about your progress. None of this would be possible without the great help from hundreds of our contributors [3], who translated, mapped and recorded content. All the content you find in the app was reviewed multiple times by several people and recordings are made by native speakers. No story in the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • We're breaking up with JavaScript front ends
    Sort of sounds like Apache Wicket (https://wicket.apache.org/). I used it for a few projects in the mid-late 2000s. I really liked it being server side and the concept of having object-oriented HTML (code paired with HTML snippets). I haven't had a need to use it since 2014, so haven't kept up with the project. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Can I use Java to build a website?
    You can use Java for Backend and Frontend. A relative new kid on the block for Frontend is Qute. The general keyword you are searching for is Java Templating Engine. Specific examples would be Thymeleaf or FreeMarker. There are some framework, which offer a lot more than templating like Vaadin or Wicket. Some are just specifications like Jakarta Faces with some of their implementations MyFaces or Mojarra. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Getting back into Java after 12-15 years away?
    Perhaps, a good competitor for JSF is Apache Wicket. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Options for high level front-end frameworks for Java developers
    I have used https://wicket.apache.org/ in the past and I think it matches your needs. It's a simple mvc that focuses on the actual java code writing and uses html only on the layout of your components in your page. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing total.js and Apache Wicket, you can also consider the following products

Sails.js - Realtime MVC Framework for Node.js

Grails - An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

Backbone.js - Give your JS App some Backbone with Models, Views, Collections, and Events

Vaadin Framework - Vaadin is a web application framework for Rich Internet Applications (RIA).