Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TOAST UI Editor VS Editor.js

Compare TOAST UI Editor VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

TOAST UI Editor logo TOAST UI Editor

Markdown WYSIWYG editor

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
  • TOAST UI Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

TOAST UI Editor features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

TOAST UI Editor videos

Discussing the future of Toast UI Editor in the Static Site Editor

More videos:

  • Review - TOAST UI Editor
  • Review - 모던웹(NEMV) 제작 87 위지웍 에디터 사용하기(toast ui editor)

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TOAST UI Editor and Editor.js)
Text Editors
17 17%
83% 83
IDEs And Text Editors
30 30%
70% 70
Rich Text Editor
21 21%
79% 79
WYSIWYG Editor
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using TOAST UI Editor and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare TOAST UI Editor and Editor.js

TOAST UI Editor Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Toast UI editor will be a perfect fit if you deal with Markdown documents to publish web pages.
Source: itsfoss.com

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TOAST UI Editor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TOAST UI Editor mentions (2)

Editor.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editor.js yet. Tracking of Editor.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TOAST UI Editor and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Jodit - Open Source WYSIWYG editor written in pure TypeScript

Summernote - Summernote is a JavaScript library that helps users create WYSIWYG editors online.

Typora - A minimal Markdown reading & writing app.