Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Three.js VS Micron.JS

Compare Three.js VS Micron.JS and see what are their differences

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

Micron.JS logo Micron.JS

A [μ] microInteraction library built with CSS and JavaScript
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • Micron.JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-03

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Micron.JS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Micron.JS is a small and efficient library, which makes it easy to integrate into projects without significantly increasing their size.
  • Ease of use
    Micron.JS offers simple and straightforward syntax, allowing developers to quickly apply CSS animations to their web projects.
  • Customizability
    The library provides customization options that allow developers to tailor animations to match the specific needs and aesthetics of their applications.
  • Interactive Animations
    Micron.JS supports interactive animations that enhance user experience by making web elements more engaging.

Possible disadvantages of Micron.JS

  • Limited Animation Features
    Compared to larger animation libraries, Micron.JS offers a more limited set of features and capabilities.
  • Dependency
    It is an additional dependency, which might not be ideal for projects aiming to minimize external library usage.
  • Maintenance and Community
    As a smaller library, it may not have a large community or frequent updates, which could impact long-term usage.
  • Not Suitable for Complex Animations
    Micron.JS is not designed for handling complex animation scenarios, so it may not be suitable for projects needing more advanced animation techniques.

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Micron.JS videos

No Micron.JS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Three.js and Micron.JS)
Javascript UI Libraries
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Flowcharts
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Three.js and Micron.JS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Three.js and Micron.JS

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Micron.JS Reviews

We have no reviews of Micron.JS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 247 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Three.js mentions (247)

  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Optimizing Three.js: 4 Key Techniques
    But code can also create something visually stunning, something everyone can appreciate. This is where tools like Three.js shine. However, Three.js can be heavy, especially when used in a dynamic web page accessed by devices with varying computational power. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

Micron.JS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Micron.JS yet. Tracking of Micron.JS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Three.js and Micron.JS, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Animista - Create beautiful CSS animations in your browser

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Animate.css - Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

vov.css - A small class-based animation library consisting of small but useful animations.