Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Three.js VS FilePond.js

Compare Three.js VS FilePond.js and see what are their differences

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

FilePond.js logo FilePond.js

Uploads anything you throw at it
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • FilePond.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

FilePond.js features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    FilePond.js offers a highly intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to upload, preview, and manage files with drag-and-drop functionality.
  • Extensive Plugin System
    The library supports a wide range of plugins that can extend its functionality, allowing for features like image cropping, file size validation, and asynchronous uploads.
  • Customization Options
    FilePond.js is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the appearance and behavior of the file input to match their application's design and requirements.
  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    It offers strong support for modern web browsers and ensures consistent performance across different platforms.
  • Responsive Design
    The library is designed to be responsive, ensuring a consistent and optimized experience across a variety of devices, including mobile and desktop.
  • Developer-friendly Documentation
    Comprehensive and well-structured documentation makes it straightforward for developers to integrate and make the most of FilePond.js.

Possible disadvantages of FilePond.js

  • File Size Limitations
    While FilePond.js itself can handle large files, its performance can be limited by the browser and network capabilities, which might slow down the user experience for very large file uploads.
  • Dependency on Modern Browsers
    FilePond.js works best on modern browsers that support the latest HTML5 and JavaScript features, which might exclude users on older browser versions.
  • Potential Overhead
    The inclusion of multiple plugins and customizations can add to the file size and complexity of the app, which may affect load times and performance.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite the comprehensive documentation, there can be an initial learning curve for developers new to FilePond.js or those integrating it into complex applications.
  • Third-party Integration
    Integrating FilePond.js with other third-party services (e.g., cloud storage, server-side validation) may require additional configuration and coding, which could add to development time.

Analysis of FilePond.js

Overall verdict

  • FilePond.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a robust and customizable file uploading solution with a clean and modern UI. Its active community and continuous updates ensure that it stays relevant and efficient.

Why this product is good

  • FilePond.js is an advanced file upload library that is praised for its easy-to-use interface, flexibility, and ability to handle multiple file types and asynchronous uploads smoothly. It also offers many configuration options and plugins that allow developers to customize the user experience and integrate it seamlessly into various frameworks and platforms.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a modern file upload library with a customizable interface.
  • Projects that require support for multiple file types and asynchronous uploads.
  • Applications that benefit from drag-and-drop functionality and real-time image previews.
  • Teams that need integration with various web frameworks and a strong plugin ecosystem.

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

FilePond.js videos

No FilePond.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Three.js and FilePond.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
90 90%
10% 10
Flowcharts
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Charting Libraries
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Three.js and FilePond.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Three.js and FilePond.js

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

FilePond.js Reviews

We have no reviews of FilePond.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than FilePond.js. While we know about 248 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 5 mentions of FilePond.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

FilePond.js mentions (5)

  • Any good library to handle file uploads???
    Just looking at the docs for react-dropzone, they recommend Filepond for something similar to what you're looking for. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Can't get Django to work with FilePond for some reason
    I've had this problem for a while. I'm using filepond on the frontend for uploading files, and I've followed their setup documentation, but I cannot for the life of me get it to work. I'm using django-drf-filepond as the backend for my FilePond uploads, but I keep getting `Bad Request: /uploads/process/` errors. My FilePond configuration is. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Form data with HTML5 FormData file upload - [HELP]
    This works as intended if the form does not invoke filepond. Source: over 3 years ago
  • What is the best React video and image upload library?
    I'm a big fan of this library: https://pqina.nl/filepond/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Awesome Things Related To React Hooks 😍
    React Filepond - A new way to upload files. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Three.js and FilePond.js, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Glottologist - JavaScript translation framework