Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

The Tidelift Subscription VS OWASP Dependency-Track

Compare The Tidelift Subscription VS OWASP Dependency-Track and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

The Tidelift Subscription logo The Tidelift Subscription

Pro developers get assurances. OSS maintainers get paid.

OWASP Dependency-Track logo OWASP Dependency-Track

OWASP Dependency-Track is an intelligent Software Composition Analysis (SCA) platform that allows...
  • The Tidelift Subscription Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • OWASP Dependency-Track Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03

The Tidelift Subscription features and specs

  • Security
    Tidelift continuously monitors security vulnerabilities in open source components and provides timely patches, which helps ensure that the software you are using is secure.
  • Maintenance
    The subscription ensures that the open source packages are actively maintained, reducing the risk of encountering outdated or unsupported software.
  • Legal Assurance
    Tidelift offers legal assurances, including intellectual property indemnification, reducing potential legal risks associated with using open source software.
  • Centralized Management
    It provides a centralized way to manage open source dependencies, making it easier for organizations to keep track of which components are being used and their respective health.
  • Open Source Sustainability
    By subscribing, organizations financially support the maintainers of the open source projects they use, contributing to the sustainability of open source development.

Possible disadvantages of The Tidelift Subscription

  • Cost
    There is a financial cost associated with the subscription, which might not be feasible for smaller organizations or individual developers.
  • Dependency Limitations
    Tidelift covers a wide range of open source projects, but not all projects are included. Organizations might need to manage unsupported dependencies separately.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating Tidelift into an existing development workflow may require some time and effort, which might be a barrier for rapid adoption.
  • Vendor Lock-in Risk
    Relying on a third-party service for managing open source dependencies may create a form of vendor lock-in, as organizations become dependent on Tidelift's ecosystem.

OWASP Dependency-Track features and specs

  • Proactive Vulnerability Management
    Dependency-Track allows organizations to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in their software dependencies. By continuously monitoring and analyzing the components in use, it helps in preventing potential security breaches before they are exploited.
  • Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics on the security status of an organization's dependencies. This aids in tracking the risk profile over time, making informed decisions, and prioritizing remediation efforts effectively.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    Dependency-Track can be seamlessly integrated into continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring that dependencies are automatically assessed for vulnerabilities as part of the software development lifecycle, enhancing security without disrupting development processes.
  • Support for Multiple Package Ecosystems
    Offering support for a wide range of package ecosystems, Dependency-Track can analyze components from various sources, making it versatile and applicable to a broad spectrum of technology stacks used by different organizations.
  • Open Source and Community-Driven
    Being an open-source project, Dependency-Track benefits from community contributions, which enhances its features, security, and reliability over time. It allows users to customize and adapt the tool according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OWASP Dependency-Track

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Dependency-Track can be complex and time-consuming, especially for organizations that are new to vulnerability management tools. It may require a steep learning curve for effective use.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Dependency-Track, particularly in an enterprise environment with many projects and dependencies, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and storage, which may result in increased operational costs.
  • False Positives and Negatives
    Like many automated security tools, Dependency-Track may occasionally report false positives or fail to identify certain vulnerabilities (false negatives). This necessitates manual verification, which can be time-consuming and might require additional expertise.
  • Dependence on External Data Sources
    Dependency-Track relies on external vulnerability databases and data sources for its analyses (such as the National Vulnerability Database). Any inaccuracies or updates to these data sources can directly affect the accuracy of its vulnerability assessments.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    The tool's functionality is somewhat limited in offline environments because it needs access to external vulnerability databases for the most current information, which can restrict its usage in isolated networks or environments with strict internet usage policies.

Analysis of OWASP Dependency-Track

Overall verdict

  • OWASP Dependency-Track is a highly recommended tool for organizations that prioritize security in their software development lifecycle. Its comprehensive features and community-driven nature make it an excellent choice for managing dependencies and vulnerabilities effectively.

Why this product is good

  • OWASP Dependency-Track is a powerful and popular tool designed for managing and mitigating risks associated with the use of third-party and open-source components in your software projects. It excels in identifying and tracking vulnerabilities, helping organizations maintain secure software practices. The platform is highly regarded for its integration capabilities with CI/CD pipelines, detailed reporting, and support for multiple languages and ecosystems. Being an open-source project, it benefits from community feedback and contributions, which enhances its adaptability and overall reliability.

Recommended for

    OWASP Dependency-Track is ideal for security-conscious development teams, DevSecOps professionals, and organizations with a strong focus on application security. It is particularly beneficial for those using a wide array of open-source components who need to ensure ongoing compliance with security standards.

The Tidelift Subscription videos

A demo of the Tidelift Subscription

OWASP Dependency-Track videos

No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to The Tidelift Subscription and OWASP Dependency-Track)
Fundraising And Donation Management
Security
0 0%
100% 100
Crowdfunding
100 100%
0% 0
Open Source
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using The Tidelift Subscription and OWASP Dependency-Track. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

The Tidelift Subscription might be a bit more popular than OWASP Dependency-Track. We know about 25 links to it since March 2021 and only 19 links to OWASP Dependency-Track. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

The Tidelift Subscription mentions (25)

View more

OWASP Dependency-Track mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Pre-alpha tool for analyzing spdx SBOMs generated by GitHub
    I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • SQL Injection Isn't Dead Yet
    To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Krita fund has 0 corporate support
    Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Friends - needs help choosing solution for SBOM vulnerability
    OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • software inventory of my ECS tasks
    I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing The Tidelift Subscription and OWASP Dependency-Track, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Bubblewrap - Unprivileged sandboxing tool

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.

Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.

FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis