Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

The Factual VS Rantt

Compare The Factual VS Rantt and see what are their differences

The Factual logo The Factual

Hottest news topics, most credible stories

Rantt logo Rantt

Rantt is for people who want to stay informed and engage with a community of free-thinkers.
  • The Factual Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-09

The Factual helps people find unbiased news on trending news topics. It applies a machine learning engine to transparently rate 10,000+ articles/day and curates the most credible stories across the political spectrum. The Factual's email newsletter and website are growing fast with strong engagement and retention. The two co-founders are from Stanford and IIT-Madras, and have raised pre-seed funding from Defy Ventures.

  • Rantt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

The Factual videos

The Factual News Quick Review (from Episode 5)

More videos:

  • Review - INS Rajput || Indian Navy Destroyers || The Factual

Rantt videos

No Rantt videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to The Factual and Rantt)
News
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
100% 100
Chrome Extensions
100 100%
0% 0
RSS Reader
47 47%
53% 53

User comments

Share your experience with using The Factual and Rantt. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, The Factual should be more popular than Rantt. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

The Factual mentions (5)

  • Sam on Tucker Carlson and why left-wing media is the only legitimate news source: "The only legitimate media, for the most part, is left-wing media ... Breitbart and Fox are not journalism ... I care about them as destructive forces in our society; they're pseudo media."
    From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago
  • A rebel disrupted The View today, interrupting climate-denying guest Ted Cruz.
    According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How do I grow my blog newsletter subscriptions?
    We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Show HN: The Sample – newsletters curated for you with machine learning
    > Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • What's behind the rise in anti-Asian hate crime? Join us on Clubhouse today!
    Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: about 3 years ago

Rantt mentions (1)

  • LoL
    The first link says that GOP members have 38 times more convictions? Since when do convictions = corruption. It doesn't say what those convictions are for which would be relevant when gauging corruption. Also there is a significant number of data missing from your source. It appears that convictions of donors to campaigns is also included? This seems incredibly cherry picked and I can't find any other statistic... Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing The Factual and Rantt, you can also consider the following products

Fact Check by Google - Google fights fake news in search with 'fact check'

Grasswire - A real-time newsroom controlled by everyone

Partial Press - Breaking news according to political bias 🗞

Pressbase - Create professional online newsroom for free

Ground News Pro - Platform to compare news sources covering the same issue

Briefkase - Digital Marketing for Startups & SMEs