Metafact VS Fact Check by Google

Metafact

Verify facts with the world's scientists

Fact Check by Google

Google fights fake news in search with 'fact check'

Landing page //
2023-10-10

Landing page //
2023-01-08

Metafact features and specs

Expert-Driven Verification
Metafact leverages a network of experts to verify information, providing a higher level of accuracy in the answers and reviews of scientific and medical claims.
Focus on Science and Medicine
The platform is dedicated to fact-checking scientific and medical claims, making it a reliable source for this specialized information.
User Accessibility
Its user-friendly interface makes it easy for anyone to submit questions and navigate through the database of verified information.

Possible disadvantages of Metafact

Limited Scope
Metafact primarily focuses on science and medicine, which might not address needs related to fact-checking in other domains.
Expert Availability
The speed and variety of answer availability are contingent on expert participation, which can be inconsistent at times.
Potential Bias
Although expert-driven, the potential for unconscious bias exists due to varying interpretations of data and differing expert opinions.

Fact Check by Google features and specs

Increased Access to Verified Information
Google Fact Check helps users access information that has been verified by fact-checkers, which can lead to a more informed public.
Combat False Information
By providing fact-checking labels, Google aims to combat the spread of false information online.
Global Reach
The tool is available worldwide, enabling people from different regions to benefit from access to fact-checked information.
Encourages Credible Sources
The presence of fact-checking might encourage publishers to maintain credibility and accuracy in their reporting.

Possible disadvantages of Fact Check by Google

Reliance on Fact-Checking Organizations
The effectiveness of Google's Fact Check depends on the reliability and biases of the fact-checking organizations they partner with.
May Not Cover All Topics
Not every claim or piece of information can be checked, potentially leaving gaps in coverage.
Subjectivity and Bias
Fact-checking itself can carry biases, as different organizations may have varying standards and determination of 'truth.'
Impact on Free Speech
Some critics argue that fact-checking may inadvertently influence or restrict free speech by labeling information with official 'truth' labels.

Metafact videos

+ Add

Metafact Member Introduction

Fact Check by Google videos

No Fact Check by Google videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Metafact and Fact Check by Google)

Fact Check by Google

News

32 32%

News

68% 68

Chrome Extensions

35 35%

Chrome Extensions

65% 65

Safari Extensions

34 34%

Safari Extensions

66% 66

Tech

100 100%

Tech

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Metafact and Fact Check by Google. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Metafact seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Metafact mentions (1)

Is there a way to seperate or extract the johnson and johnson vaccine out of my body? I am serious not joking
Just please ask someone with specific knowledge of these things before you embark on them. Check Wikipedia, it is very peer reviewed when it comes to science based information. Try out metafact as well. Remember just because something has someone with letters before their name (Dr) or qualifications under their belt, still check out the person, a vaguely connected qualification from 40 years ago doesn't hold a lot... Source: almost 4 years ago