Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

TestFlight VS Cypress.io

Compare TestFlight VS Cypress.io and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

TestFlight logo TestFlight

iOS beta testing on the fly.

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
  • TestFlight Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-25
  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17

TestFlight features and specs

  • Ease of Distribution
    TestFlight simplifies the process of distributing beta versions of your app to testers. You can easily invite testers via email, or they can join via a public link.
  • Integrated with Apple Ecosystem
    As part of the Apple Developer ecosystem, TestFlight seamlessly integrates with Xcode and other Apple tools, making it easier to manage builds and deploy across various Apple devices.
  • User Feedback Collection
    TestFlight allows testers to provide feedback directly through the app, which is consolidated and sent to your Apple Developer account, improving the feedback loop.
  • Crash Reporting
    Built-in crash reporting helps you gather detailed crash logs from testers, enabling quicker diagnosis and resolution of issues.
  • Automated Updates
    Testers receive notifications for automatic updates of new builds, ensuring that they are always testing the latest version.

Possible disadvantages of TestFlight

  • Limited to Apple Devices
    TestFlight can only be used to test apps on Apple devices, limiting its utility if you also need to test on Android or other platforms.
  • Max Tester Limit
    There is a limit of up to 10,000 beta testers per app, which might be restrictive for large-scale beta testing programs.
  • Approval Process
    Each build you distribute through TestFlight must first be reviewed and approved by Apple, which can introduce delays in testing cycles.
  • No In-App Purchases
    TestFlight does not support in-app purchases, so you cannot test purchase flows in your beta builds.
  • Requires Apple ID
    All testers must have an Apple ID to participate in testing, which can be a barrier for some testers.

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

Analysis of TestFlight

Overall verdict

  • Yes, TestFlight is a good tool for iOS developers looking to streamline their beta testing process. It provides a seamless experience for both developers and testers, ensuring that the app can be fine-tuned and free of crucial bugs before its official release.

Why this product is good

  • TestFlight is a platform provided by Apple that allows developers to distribute their beta apps to testers before releasing them on the App Store. It is valued for its ease of use, integration with iOS development tools, and the ability to gather valuable feedback and performance data from early users. Testers can easily install beta versions of apps, report issues, and developers can manage builds efficiently.

Recommended for

    iOS developers who want a reliable and easy-to-use platform for testing their apps with real users before launching to the App Store. It is especially beneficial for those who are looking to receive actionable feedback and improve app quality through user testing.

Analysis of Cypress.io

Overall verdict

  • Cypress.io is considered a good testing tool for developers due to its efficiency, ease of use, and robust testing capabilities. Its growing community and continuous updates make it a worthwhile choice for web testing.

Why this product is good

  • Cypress.io is a powerful end-to-end testing framework for web applications. It offers a user-friendly interface, excellent documentation, and provides fast and reliable testing with real-time reloads and debugging. It also integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and supports modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.js.

Recommended for

  • Frontend developers who need to test web applications.
  • Teams looking for a reliable end-to-end testing solution.
  • Projects using modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js.
  • Developers who require a tool with extensive documentation and community support.

TestFlight videos

+ Add

BETAFPV HX100 100FPV Quad Review!✨TestFlight✨

Cypress.io videos

+ Add

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TestFlight and Cypress.io)

TestFlight

Cypress.io

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
Beta Testing / Mobile App Distribution
100 100%
Beta Testing / Mobile App Distribution
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TestFlight and Cypress.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare TestFlight and Cypress.io

TestFlight Reviews

  1. Deepak Kumar
    · Blogger at EINSSTARK ·
    TestFlight Review

    The TestFlight app allows testers to install and beta test apps on iOS, tvOS, and watchOS devices.

    TestFlight also supports some basic analytics and feedback collection features like tracking downloads and adoption and capturing device details, remote logs, crash reports, and tester feedback.

    Their latest beta update allows users to send screenshots and feedback to developers without leaving the app.

    🏁 Competitors: Gennymotion, TestFairy, Visual Studio App Center

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Source: www.lambdatest.com
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Cypress.io might be a bit more popular than TestFlight. We know about 27 links to it since March 2021 and only 26 links to TestFlight. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TestFlight mentions (26)

  • As Visual Studio App Center closes, a look back, and what to use now?
    Prior to being acquired by Microsoft, HockeyApp was among the two most popular tools for teams managing their "in-house" iOS and Android app distribution, whether sharing in-development app builds to QA testers, or companies wishing to distribute internally without publishing to platforms like Apple's strictly-gatekept App Store. The other platform being TestFlight, itself acquired by Apple in 2014, and shut down... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Lessons Learned from Building Mobile Apps and Software for Startups
    The goal of your first version is not to impress but to learn. Launch quickly, gather user feedback, and iterate. Publishing a mobile app, even an MVP, can involve delays from app store reviews. Use platforms like TestFlight or Firebase App Distribution to share test versions with users. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Which iOS Performance Testing Tools should be used in 2025?
    4. Testflight TestFlight is another application developed by Apple to let users test their App Clips to collect valuable feedback before releasing them on the App Store. Since it is backed directly by Apple, it has all the features you might need for your iOS performance testing tools. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • As an app developer, how do you get your initial users to test your app and give feedback?
    If you have an Apple Developer account use TestFlight. Source: about 2 years ago
  • React vs React Native: How Different Are They, Really?
    Also since it’s mobile, you can’t avoid manual testing completely, no matter how much you automate. Plan to allocate time for testing setup in each project, since TestFlight and Play Store configuration are non-trivial (especially the former). Once again, EAS makes this easier, so save yourself frustration and use it. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TestFlight and Cypress.io, you can also consider the following products

Visual Studio App Center - Continuous everything – build, test, deploy, engage, repeat

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Applivery - Mobile Apps distribution system for Continuous deployment, Beta testing, Feedback, Bug reporting & Enterprise App distribution.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

Appaloosa-Store - Appaloosa helps businesses maximize the deployment of enterprise mobile apps. Deploy your enterprise app store for Apple iOS and Android apps to employees & testers.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

Loading...