Software Alternatives & Reviews

Testcontainers VS Capybara

Compare Testcontainers VS Capybara and see what are their differences

Testcontainers logo Testcontainers

Testcontainers is a modern Java library that comes with the exclusive support of Junit tests.

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.
  • Testcontainers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05

Testcontainers videos

Testcontainers – From Zero to Hero

More videos:

  • Review - Testcontainers: a Year-in-review (Kevin Wittek)
  • Review - Testcontainers: a Year-in-review (Kevin Wittek)

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Testcontainers and Capybara)
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
25 25%
75% 75
Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Testcontainers and Capybara. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Capybara might be a bit more popular than Testcontainers. We know about 11 links to it since March 2021 and only 11 links to Testcontainers. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Testcontainers mentions (11)

  • Multiple MongoDB Databases on Spring Boot
    To be able to test for multiple databases, I recommend you using Testcontainers. That's my configuration to start the container:. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
  • Show HN: I open-sourced the in-memory PostgreSQL I built at work for E2E tests
    I don't get it either. Why not use something like https://testcontainers.com/? - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Rust Tooling: 8 tools that will increase your productivity
    Testing with added infrastructure can be quite tricky. Testcontainers aims to solve this by providing an open-source framework for providing local, lightweight containers for your application that can be immediately thrown away after use. It also has a Rust SDK! - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Run and test DynamoDB applications locally using Docker and Testcontainers
    This is a good start. But DynamoDB Local is a great fit for Testcontainers which "is an open source framework for providing throwaway, lightweight instances of databases, message brokers, web browsers, or just about anything that can run in a Docker container.". - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Quarkus : Greener, Better, Faster, Stronger
    Devservices supports the automatic provisioning of unconfigured third party services in development and test mode. They can be provided by extension leveraging (usually) TestContainer library. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Capybara mentions (11)

  • 16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
    Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Using Capybara to test responsive code
    Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Minitest vs. RSpec in Rails
    Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • From partials to ViewComponents: writing reusable front-end code in Rails
    The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Tip: if you're changing all your form_for to form_with, take the opportunity to make sure all forms are being tested.
    To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Testcontainers and Capybara, you can also consider the following products

Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

TestNG - TestNG is a testing framework.