Capybara might be a bit more popular than Testcontainers. We know about 11 links to it since March 2021 and only 11 links to Testcontainers. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
To be able to test for multiple databases, I recommend you using Testcontainers. That's my configuration to start the container:. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
I don't get it either. Why not use something like https://testcontainers.com/? - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Testing with added infrastructure can be quite tricky. Testcontainers aims to solve this by providing an open-source framework for providing local, lightweight containers for your application that can be immediately thrown away after use. It also has a Rust SDK! - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
This is a good start. But DynamoDB Local is a great fit for Testcontainers which "is an open source framework for providing throwaway, lightweight instances of databases, message brokers, web browsers, or just about anything that can run in a Docker container.". - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Devservices supports the automatic provisioning of unconfigured third party services in development and test mode. They can be provided by extension leveraging (usually) TestContainer library. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.
Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.
RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.
TestNG - TestNG is a testing framework.