Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Telerik VS ASP.NET Core

Compare Telerik VS ASP.NET Core and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Telerik logo Telerik

UI Frameworks and App Development Tools

ASP.NET Core logo ASP.NET Core

With ASP.
  • Telerik Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06
  • ASP.NET Core Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18

Telerik features and specs

  • Extensive UI Component Library
    Telerik provides a comprehensive set of UI components for web, desktop, and mobile applications, which can speed up development and ensure consistency in application design.
  • High Performance
    The controls and components are optimized for performance, which helps in creating high-performance applications.
  • Rich Documentation and Support
    Telerik offers detailed documentation, tutorials, and a strong support system, including forums and direct customer support.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    Tools and components for various frameworks such as ASP.NET, Blazor, Angular, React, Vue, Xamarin, and more, facilitating cross-platform development.
  • Frequent Updates
    Regular updates and new features are added, ensuring that the tools and components stay current with technological advancements.
  • Ease of Use
    Highly customizable components that are designed to be easy to use and integrate, which can reduce the learning curve for developers.

Possible disadvantages of Telerik

  • Cost
    Telerik products come with a significant cost, which might be a concern for startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, the depth and breadth of the library can present a learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to Telerik.
  • Dependency
    Reliance on Telerik components can make it harder to switch technologies or frameworks in the future, as much of the codebase may be dependent on Telerik-specific implementations.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, the use of highly sophisticated components can introduce performance overhead, particularly in large and complex applications.
  • Complexity for Simple Applications
    For very simple applications, Telerik might be overkill, adding unnecessary complexity and bloat.
  • Customization Limitations
    While many components are customizable, there can be limitations or challenges when highly specific or unique customizations are required.

ASP.NET Core features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework, which means you can run your applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux. This flexibility allows developers to target a wider range of environments without being locked into a single operating system.
  • High Performance
    ASP.NET Core is known for its high performance, being built from the ground up to optimize speed and scalability. It uses a modular framework architecture and supports asynchronous programming, making it suitable for modern, high-traffic applications.
  • Unified MVC and Web API Frameworks
    In ASP.NET Core, MVC and Web API frameworks are unified into a single framework, simplifying the development model for building web and API-based applications.
  • Dependency Injection
    Built-in support for dependency injection simplifies the management of dependencies across the application, promoting cleaner architecture and testability.
  • Open Source and Community Support
    ASP.NET Core is open source and has a strong community around it. This means that developers have access to the source code and can contribute to its development. It also benefits from continuous improvements driven by community feedback.
  • Cloud Integration
    ASP.NET Core is designed with cloud deployment in mind, providing features and templates for streamlined integration with cloud platforms such as Azure.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET Core

  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, ASP.NET Core can have a steep learning curve for developers new to the framework or web development in general, due to its comprehensive set of features and tools.
  • Maturity of Third-Party Libraries
    Compared to the .NET Framework, some third-party libraries may not be fully mature or offer as many features, given that ASP.NET Core is a more recent platform.
  • Frequent Updates
    ASP.NET Core has a fast release cycle, which can be challenging for developers to keep up with. Frequent updates can mean regular changes to the framework that might require adjustments in application code.
  • Limited Windows-Specific Technology Support
    Some Windows-specific technologies and libraries might have limited or no support in ASP.NET Core, which can be a disadvantage for applications heavily reliant on those technologies.

Telerik videos

+ Add

Telerik & Kendo UI

More videos:

  • Review - Review Telerik UI Tools
  • Review - Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core - Overview

ASP.NET Core videos

+ Add

Intro to ASP.NET Core Razor Pages - From Start to Published

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Telerik and ASP.NET Core)

Telerik

ASP.NET Core

Prototyping
100 100%
Prototyping
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
Software Development
100 100%
Software Development
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Telerik and ASP.NET Core. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Telerik and ASP.NET Core

Telerik Reviews

We have no reviews of Telerik yet.
Be the first one to post

ASP.NET Core Reviews

Top 5 Flutter Alternatives for Cross-Platform Development
As for performance, both ASP.NET and Flutter perform really well. For ASP.NET Core, it’s partly due to the lightweight and efficient Kestrel web server. Flutter’s speed is thanks to the Dart VM and Ahead-of-Time (AOT) compilation.
Source: www.miquido.com
Exploring 15 Powerful Flutter Alternatives
ASP.NET Core is an open-source and cross-platform framework for building modern cloud-enabled web apps on Windows, Mac, and Linux. One unique capability ASP.NET Core introduces relates to scalability. The framework provides native integration with cloud platforms like Azure that allow web apps to scale up or out to potentially even millions of users with no code...
Source: positiwise.medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ASP.NET Core seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Telerik mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Telerik yet. Tracking of Telerik recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ASP.NET Core mentions (5)

  • The Case For Go Backends
    However, usage of a C# framework like ASP .NET Core or a Java framework like OfficeFloor are more than capable in the right hands. The key is to understand the tradeoffs of each language and framework, and to choose the right tool for the job. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Exploring Xperience By Kentico: Introductions
    The administration UI is now built on React and ASP.NET Core which means it's fast 🚀! - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Trying to learn ASP.NET core, but confused by the documentation
    Per https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/learn/aspnet/what-is-aspnet-core, "ASP.NET Core is the open-source version of ASP.NET, that runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows. ASP.NET Core was first released in 2016 and is a re-design of earlier Windows-only versions of ASP.NET.". Source: over 2 years ago
  • How can I convince my boss not to use Windows Server?
    But how about you both get your wishes: ASP.NET Core? Use a Linux server - with which you are familiar with, to host the live/production version. And the web application itself can be locally developed and tested in ASP.NET on a Windows server, which is what your boss wants? Source: over 3 years ago
  • 3 Different Hosting Models in Blazor
    Let’s remember that ASP.NET Core is cross-platform and can run practically anywhere. If you find yourself using C # for all your development, this is probably the best scenario for you to use anyway. With it, you can deploy your web application, which would also contain your Blazor Wasm assets in the same location. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Telerik and ASP.NET Core, you can also consider the following products

Syncfusion - The world's best UI component suite for building powerful web, desktop, and mobile apps

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

MockFlow - A super easy wireframing tool with all the other tools you need in the product design process

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Axure - The most powerful way to plan, prototype and hand off to developers, all without code. Download a free trial and see why professionals choose Axure RP 9.

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Loading...