Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

TamoSoft Throughput Test VS PPerf

Compare TamoSoft Throughput Test VS PPerf and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

TamoSoft Throughput Test logo TamoSoft Throughput Test

TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

PPerf logo PPerf

PowerShell Iperf GUI - A PowerShell script to start iperf and show the output (similar to Jperf).
  • TamoSoft Throughput Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-27
  • PPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10

TamoSoft Throughput Test features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    TamoSoft Throughput Test provides a detailed analysis of network performance, including metrics for UDP and TCP throughput, latency, jitter, and packet loss.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool is available for both Windows and macOS, making it versatile for users with different operating systems.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    It features an intuitive interface that allows users to easily configure the testing parameters and understand the results.
  • Real-Time Graphical Results
    Provides real-time graphical display of test results which helps in the quick analysis of network performance.
  • Free of Charge
    TamoSoft Throughput Test is free to use, which makes it accessible to a wide range of users without financial constraints.

Possible disadvantages of TamoSoft Throughput Test

  • Limited to Local Network Testing
    The tool is primarily designed for LAN and WLAN performance testing, which may not be suitable for WAN or internet speed tests.
  • Dependency on Available Hardware
    The accuracy of the tool depends on the quality and capabilities of the network hardware being used for testing.
  • Potential Complexity in Advanced Configurations
    While the basic setup is straightforward, users requiring advanced configurations might find it complex without adequate networking knowledge.
  • No Mobile Version
    There is no mobile version of the application, which limits its usability for testing on mobile devices.

PPerf features and specs

  • Open Source
    PPerf is available as open-source software, which means that developers can freely access, modify, and distribute the source code. This promotes transparency and community collaboration.
  • Performance Monitoring
    PPerf provides robust tools for performance monitoring, making it easier for developers to analyze and optimize application performance efficiently.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool supports multiple platforms, ensuring that developers can use it regardless of their operating system, whether it's Windows, Linux, or macOS.
  • Comprehensive Metrics
    It offers comprehensive metrics and visualizations that help in understanding the performance characteristics of applications in depth.

Possible disadvantages of PPerf

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Beginners might find it challenging to use PPerf due to its extensive feature set and lack of beginner-friendly tutorials or guides.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a niche open-source project, it may have limited community support, which could be a hurdle when seeking help or troubleshooting issues.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    Like many performance monitoring tools, PPerf might introduce some overhead, potentially affecting the performance of the application being monitored.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating PPerf into existing systems might require additional work or complex configurations, particularly if the environment has customized setups.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TamoSoft Throughput Test and PPerf)

TamoSoft Throughput Test

PPerf

Monitoring Tools
65 65%
Monitoring Tools
35% 35
Log Management
60 60%
Log Management
40% 40
Network & Admin
66 66%
Network & Admin
34% 34
Tool
72 72%
Tool
28% 28

User comments

Share your experience with using TamoSoft Throughput Test and PPerf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TamoSoft Throughput Test and PPerf, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

jsPerf - A performance playground for JavaScript developers. Easily create and share test cases and run cross-browser benchmarks to find out which code snippet is most efficient.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

benchmark.js - A benchmarking library that supports high-resolution timers & returns statistically significant results.

NetStress - NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.

Loading...