Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

benchmark.js VS PPerf

Compare benchmark.js VS PPerf and see what are their differences

benchmark.js logo benchmark.js

A benchmarking library that supports high-resolution timers & returns statistically significant results.

PPerf logo PPerf

PowerShell Iperf GUI - A PowerShell script to start iperf and show the output (similar to Jperf).
  • benchmark.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-26
  • PPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10

benchmark.js features and specs

  • Accurate Benchmarking
    Benchmark.js provides accurate and reliable performance tests for JavaScript code by internally handling variations and measurement issues, offering confidence in the benchmarks produced.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    This library is compatible with different JavaScript environments, including browsers and Node.js, allowing developers to use it across various platforms without modification.
  • High Resolution Timing
    Benchmark.js takes advantage of high-resolution timers to offer precise measurements of performance, which is crucial for sophisticated benchmarking needs.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library offers various utilities and features, such as statistical data, deep comparisons, and asynchronous testing capabilities, making it versatile for complex use cases.
  • Active Maintenance
    Benchmark.js is actively maintained and has a solid community, ensuring updates, improvements, and support when necessary.

Possible disadvantages of benchmark.js

  • Complexity
    For newcomers or those with simple benchmarking needs, Benchmark.js can be overly complex given its broad range of features and configuration options.
  • Dependency Size
    The inclusion of a robust library like Benchmark.js may introduce additional dependencies and increase the overall bundle size of a project, which can be a concern for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive nature, there might be a steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with benchmarking practices or the library's specific syntax and functions.
  • Browser Limitations
    While it works well in most environments, Browser-based benchmarks can be affected by outside influences (e.g., browser throttling) that are outside the library's control, possibly leading to inconsistent results.

PPerf features and specs

  • Open Source
    PPerf is available as open-source software, which means that developers can freely access, modify, and distribute the source code. This promotes transparency and community collaboration.
  • Performance Monitoring
    PPerf provides robust tools for performance monitoring, making it easier for developers to analyze and optimize application performance efficiently.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool supports multiple platforms, ensuring that developers can use it regardless of their operating system, whether it's Windows, Linux, or macOS.
  • Comprehensive Metrics
    It offers comprehensive metrics and visualizations that help in understanding the performance characteristics of applications in depth.

Possible disadvantages of PPerf

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Beginners might find it challenging to use PPerf due to its extensive feature set and lack of beginner-friendly tutorials or guides.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a niche open-source project, it may have limited community support, which could be a hurdle when seeking help or troubleshooting issues.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    Like many performance monitoring tools, PPerf might introduce some overhead, potentially affecting the performance of the application being monitored.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating PPerf into existing systems might require additional work or complex configurations, particularly if the environment has customized setups.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to benchmark.js and PPerf)
Monitoring Tools
44 44%
56% 56
Log Management
42 42%
58% 58
Network & Admin
42 42%
58% 58
File Transfer
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using benchmark.js and PPerf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, benchmark.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

benchmark.js mentions (3)

  • Is there a way to automate performance tests?
    We have a series of benchmark suites using https://benchmarkjs.com/. Every CI run saves the results of the benchmarks to a json file that we persist across runs and can compare against. Source: about 3 years ago
  • How do you test performance of a function in your tests?
    We use https://benchmarkjs.com/ to get statistically significant results, then write the results with the git hash to get a view of performance after every CI build. Source: about 3 years ago
  • How to run benchmark tests in node
    Https://benchmarkjs.com is what you want. Source: about 4 years ago

PPerf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PPerf yet. Tracking of PPerf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing benchmark.js and PPerf, you can also consider the following products

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

jsPerf - A performance playground for JavaScript developers. Easily create and share test cases and run cross-browser benchmarks to find out which code snippet is most efficient.

NetIO-GUI - NetIO-GUI is a Windows frontend for the multiplatform commandline utility 'netio'.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

nuttcp - nuttcp is another network test tool, similar to iperf2 and iperf3, that has a number of unique features.