Sycamore VS BoxyHQ
Compare Sycamore VS BoxyHQ and see what are their differences
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.
featured
Sycamore
Actix
Yew
Stack Overflow
Rocket
Leaflet
FastAPI
Crystal (programming language)
BoxyHQ
Auth0
Skyflow
Frontegg
Keycloak
WorkOS
CipherStash
Dataset Search
SaaS, Premium Self-Hosted, or FREE OSS Self-Hosted
Enterprise Single Sign On (SSO) SAML SSO enables a secure authentication via an organization’s Identity Provider (IdP), as opposed to users or IT admins managing thousands, of usernames and passwords. With our product SAML Jackson, enterprise users can access your product via one of their secure IdPs (like Okta, Microsoft Azure, AWS, etc), which manages access and security for the entire organization.
Directory Sync Organizations use directories from different providers to manage users and enforce their access to organization resources. By integrating our Directory Sync product into your solution you can activate and deactivate user accounts, create groups, and keep your app in sync with the user directory in real-time. Supports the SCIM 2.0 protocol.
Additionally, we offer Audit Logs to track critical events in your application and a Data Privacy Vault to safeguard sensitive data.
Sycamore BoxyHQBoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for its comprehensive suite of security building blocks tailored specifically for developers. With features like SAML/OIDC Single Sign-On (SSO) and Directory Sync with SCIM 2.0, BoxyHQ simplifies identity management and access control for B2B SaaS companies. Its focus on providing a seamless and customizable solution empowers developers to enhance security without compromising user experience. Additionally, BoxyHQ offers Audit Logs to track critical events within the product and a Privacy Vault, an API to protect sensitive data.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for several reasons:
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ's primary audience encompasses:
BoxyHQ's answer:
The inception of BoxyHQ is deeply linked with Deepak's journey as the former CTO of a cybersecurity scaleup. In his role, Deepak wrestled with the challenge of allocating resources to enterprise compliance features that diverged from their core value proposition. Alongside Sama, they witnessed the escalating tide of cyber crimes, compounded by the concerning statistic that around 70% of development teams often bypass essential security measures due to time constraints. Motivated by this shared purpose of bringing security earlier in the developer live cycle, they embarked on a mission to address these challenges head-on. BoxyHQ emerged as a solution designed to automate product security and provide low-code APIs for seamless integration, empowering developers to implement enterprise-compliant security measures effortlessly. Through BoxyHQ, Deepak and the team strive to alleviate the burden on development teams while fortifying organizations against the escalating threats posed by cyber crimes.
BoxyHQ's answer:
We value the confidentiality of our large enterprise clients due to NDA agreements. However, some of our notable customers include Cal.com, Dub, Supademo, Spike, among many others.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ uses the following technologies: - Next.js - PostgreSQL - Docker - Kubernetes
Based on our record, Sycamore seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Perseus is a fast frontend web development framework for Rust with built-in support for reactivity using Sycamore, server-side rendering, and much more. Sycamore is a frontend library that allows you to build interactive user interfaces with Rust. I’d say that Perseus is to Sycamore as Next.js is to React, so it’ll be helpful for you to have a fair understanding of Sycamore before jumping into using Perseus —... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Sycamore, Yew, or Seed if you want a full-stack solution. (Or Leptos if you want something that's faster but less mature.). Source: about 1 year ago
There are others, like Sycamore, similar story as Leptos but imo Leptos is (currently) more ergonomic. Source: about 1 year ago
I tried my first project with yew as frontend. And my experience was after some time similar to the already mentioned ones: It is a little more to take on than I actually wanted. And some things were not straightforward to achieve. I switched to sycamore for the other projects now and I am much more satisfied (but this could also be since I have some more experience in the Rust ecosystem by now). Changing from yew... Source: about 1 year ago
If you want to do fullstack/SPA stuff, check out Sycamore, Seed, and Yew. Source: about 1 year ago
Actix - Rust's powerful actor system and most fun web framework
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
Yew - Yew is a modern Rust framework for creating multi-threaded front-end web apps using WebAssembly. It's similar to Javascript's React.
Skyflow - Skyflow’s data privacy vaults deliver security, compliance and governance via a simple API
Stack Overflow - Community-based Q&A part of the Stack Exchange platform.
Frontegg - Elegant user management, tailor-made for B2B SaaS