Sucuri Reviews

The Acid3 Test Reviews

Sucuri mentions (17)

• how to fix my sites have been blockd because of mal ware

  You should always backup your website(s). If you are not running backups, you most likely aren't maintaining efficient security measures on your website as well. The only suggestion I have is contacting Sucuri and pay to clean your website up and stick with their WAF plan. Source: about 1 year ago

• Malware - how to find the offending files

  I know you found what you're looking for but.. I would recommend doing a third party malware scan with someone like sucuri.net. If there is a backdoor somewhere then it'll just get hacked again and there's a potential that credit card processors can take action if they think the company is a liability. Source: over 1 year ago

• Is There Any Way to Force Starlink to Refresh a Webpage Instead of Using Cached Data?

  The .19 address comes back as sucuri.net - if that's your web host it makes sense. Source: over 1 year ago

• Is Your WordPress Website Secured? Few Ways to Make It Bulletproof

  Sucuri - A company known for its WordPress security plugin and website firewall. They are the best in terms of website security. Unlike the others, Sucuri also offers a malware removal service. Source: over 1 year ago

• Google Analytics of my WordPress website shows strange links

  Yeah, I used Wordfence to clean up my website and it help remove most of the infected files but it's unable to detect this file. This file keeps showing up in https://sucuri.net/ website malware checkup. Source: over 1 year ago

The Acid3 Test mentions (5)

• Shadow: New browser engine made almost in JavaScript

  Https://shadow.goose.icu/?http://acid3.acidtests.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Should there be a standard prompt for showcasing models?

  During the browser wars, web developers created “Acid Tests” to see how well a browser supported various style sheet and markup conventions. When the acid tests became popular, there were accusations that browser engineers were manipulating their rendering engines to pass those tests. For instance, some cascading style sheet attribute would pass the test, but fail to work as expected under normal use on a web page. Source: about 1 year ago

• Everyone should use Firefox

  I am sure that both firefox and chromium-based browsers will pass most of something like ACID3 test. But at this stage standards have nothing to do with reality. Standards define perhaps 10% of the code you are writing and interpretation of the rest 90% of the code is up to the browsers. Source: almost 2 years ago

• SerenityOS Browser now passes the Acid3 test

  The old version (http://acid3.acidtests.org/) will reach 97/100 on modern compliant browsers. There is a newer version (https://wpt.live/acid/acid3/test.html) which incorporates the changes made to the specs in the meantime, so modern browsers will reach 100/100 on this one again. The test was carried out against this version, as you can see in the address bar in the screenshot. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• "You don't deserve to have a job!" Debatable, but you're still wrong.

  Different PRESENTATION of content on mobile is good. Different content on mobile is the definition of r/assholedesign. It does not matter if the http user agent is a "good" one or not, it should just work. There is a specification, numerous accessibility guidelines, plenty of tests and benchmarks. This isn't 1999 anymore... 🤷‍♂️. Source: over 2 years ago