SubmitHub VS Hugo

SubmitHub Reviews

Hugo Reviews

SubmitHub mentions (10)

• How long should you promote one song if you think it's the one?

  With my band we are aiming for a monthly release and full on promotion during that month, then slowly plug it for another few weeks in the shadow of the latest single. Not yet got grips to tik-tok but will be spending weekend figuring somethings out on that front but for now its FB, Reddit, submithub.com and YouTube shorts. Source: 12 months ago

• How I got 200,000 streams on Spotify in 9 months as a broke self-published composer (and how you can too)

  All good info. I will say the only promotional service I've found worth a shit is submithub.com. Makes getting in contact with curators and promoting through playlists a million times easier. Source: about 1 year ago

• What has your experience been with submitting your songs to content curators? I recently discovered dailyplaylists.com, and while it's only been four days, I really have no complaints.

  I spent around 120 US dollars last year on submithub.com, slogging through the endless dreaded "decline" messages for ultimately three proper shares, out of like...lots. My music isn't that great or anything, solid average. It's inoffensive, not bad, but it's not going to grab you and make you think, "OMG this is amazing." Ultimately I had a very, very difficult time finding placement on that website. Source: about 1 year ago

• House/Electronic Artist Looking For Playlist to Submit to?!

  I use submithub.com with pretty good success for this. Source: over 1 year ago

• Selfpromotion via playlist push services (like playlistpush) on a small budget -test run-

  First service I tested was submithub.com. You can buy credits and then submit your song to playlist curators. Cost is between $1-3 per curator. You choose the curators yourself. I bought 50 Creds = around $50 and submit to 19 curators. I got 2 positive responses and was added to two playlists. One was very good, generated around 400 plays and the others generated 80 plays. Source: over 1 year ago

Hugo mentions (354)

• Building static websites

  At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Top 5 Open-Source Documentation Development Platforms of 2024

  Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago