Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Stylecow VS CSS Modules

Compare Stylecow VS CSS Modules and see what are their differences

Stylecow logo Stylecow

CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

CSS Modules logo CSS Modules

I’ve been intrigued by CSS Modules lately. If you haven't heard of them, this post is for you. We'll be looking at the project and it's goals and aims. If
  • Stylecow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-19
  • CSS Modules Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-21

Stylecow features and specs

  • CSS Compatibility
    Stylecow is designed to make it easier to use new CSS specifications. It allows developers to write modern CSS properties and syntax, converting them into formats that can be understood by older browsers.
  • Plugin Architecture
    Stylecow has a flexible plugin system which lets developers add, remove, and configure plugins as needed. This modular approach allows for customizing the workflow based on specific project or browser requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Stylecow is freely available for use and modification. This invites community collaboration, bug fixes, and enhancements, enriching the tool over time.
  • Easy Integration
    Stylecow integrates easily with build systems and task runners, making it a suitable choice for modern frontend development workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Stylecow

  • Limited Community Support
    Comparatively, Stylecow has a smaller community and fewer resources available than more popular projects, which may lead to challenges in finding help or documentation.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Stylecow relies on JavaScript environments such as Node.js, meaning additional setup is required, which might not align with every developer's preferences or existing project infrastructures.
  • Maintenance Concerns
    Being less renowned than its counterparts, Stylecow may face slower updates and fewer checks against real-world CSS use cases, potentially lagging in terms of new feature support or bug fixes.
  • Narrower User Base
    With many competitors, Stylecow might not be as widely adopted, leading to possible compatibility and integration issues with other tools and libraries when compared to more standard tools.

CSS Modules features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Stylecow videos

No Stylecow videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CSS Modules videos

Josh Johnston: At Least 6 Ways to Win with CSS Modules

More videos:

  • Review - Styling React Components with CSS Modules | Styling react with CSS Classes | Data Is Good
  • Review - Styling LitElement views part 2: global styles and CSS modules (Vaadin Fusion)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Stylecow and CSS Modules)
CSS Framework
43 43%
57% 57
Developer Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Design Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Stylecow and CSS Modules. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CSS Modules seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Stylecow mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Stylecow yet. Tracking of Stylecow recommendations started around Mar 2021.

CSS Modules mentions (12)

  • On why I prefer not to use elm-css
    ..., CSS Modules, CSS-in-JS, and Tailwind when I'm not constrained to do so. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Is there really no better way to isolate styles across components than CSS modules?
    From what I read about CSS modules, the style isolation provides some guard rails to prevent things like random bits of global style or having colliding rules all over the place. This makes a lot of sense, but even on huge projects, I never really have those problems. I've disciplined myself to pair a component file with a CSS file (MyComponent.jsx + MyComponent.css) and keep global styles to a minimum. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Components with separate styles - how to do?
    Any time you import CSS files into a module, that CSS becomes active on EVERY component in your entire project, so that's not really a good way to go about it. It essentially creates a tag inside the final rendered html with all of your CSS within it. If you have two CSS files, and they both have a class of .myClass then they will step on each other and cause bad things to happen to your... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why do bigger websites have the weirdest class and id names?
    They are probably using css modules. Source: over 2 years ago
  • No Caption..
    This may be a little more advanced but I'd also recommend looking into CSS modules. It basically allows you to scope your styles to individual elements preventing unwanted cascading, and simplifies naming conventions a lot (since the class names are now variables). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Stylecow and CSS Modules, you can also consider the following products

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

styled-components - styled-components is a visual primitive for the component age that also helps the user to use the ES6 and CSS to style apps.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Garden (Clojure) - Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.

Autoprefixer - autoprefixer - Parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to rules by Can I Use