Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Garden (Clojure) VS CSS Modules

Compare Garden (Clojure) VS CSS Modules and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.

CSS Modules logo CSS Modules

I’ve been intrigued by CSS Modules lately. If you haven't heard of them, this post is for you. We'll be looking at the project and it's goals and aims. If
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • CSS Modules Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-21

Garden (Clojure) features and specs

  • Clojure Interoperability
    Garden leverages Clojure's syntax and functional programming paradigms, enabling seamless integration with Clojure applications and allowing developers to utilize Clojure's features, such as macros and immutable data structures.
  • Powerful Abstraction
    Garden provides a high-level abstraction for styling, which allows developers to compose styles dynamically and programmatically. This can lead to more maintainable and reusable code compared to traditional CSS.
  • Live Reloading
    Garden integrates well with tools like Figwheel for hot reloading, allowing developers to see changes in styles immediately without refreshing the browser, which boosts productivity.
  • Code as Data
    By treating CSS as data, Garden allows for the manipulation and transformation of styles with the full power of Clojure's data processing capabilities, enabling complex style logic that would be cumbersome in vanilla CSS.

Possible disadvantages of Garden (Clojure)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with Clojure, the syntax and concepts might present a barrier to entry, requiring a learning period before being able to effectively use Garden.
  • Limited Adoption
    As a niche tool within the Clojure ecosystem, Garden has a smaller user base and community compared to more mainstream CSS preprocessors like SASS or LESS, which can limit the availability of community resources and plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    Generating styles dynamically might add to the initial rendering time compared to static style sheets, which can be a concern for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Debugging Complexity
    The abstraction and dynamic nature of Garden can make debugging CSS issues more complex, as it is not as straightforward as inspecting static CSS rules in browser developer tools.

CSS Modules features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Garden (Clojure) videos

No Garden (Clojure) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CSS Modules videos

+ Add

Josh Johnston: At Least 6 Ways to Win with CSS Modules

More videos:

  • Review - Styling React Components with CSS Modules | Styling react with CSS Classes | Data Is Good
  • Review - Styling LitElement views part 2: global styles and CSS modules (Vaadin Fusion)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Garden (Clojure) and CSS Modules)

Garden (Clojure)

CSS Modules

CSS Framework
43 43%
CSS Framework
57% 57
Developer Tools
38 38%
Developer Tools
62% 62
Design Tools
37 37%
Design Tools
63% 63
Development Tools
38 38%
Development Tools
62% 62

User comments

Share your experience with using Garden (Clojure) and CSS Modules. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CSS Modules should be more popular than Garden (Clojure). It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: almost 3 years ago

CSS Modules mentions (12)

  • On why I prefer not to use elm-css
    ..., CSS Modules, CSS-in-JS, and Tailwind when I'm not constrained to do so. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Is there really no better way to isolate styles across components than CSS modules?
    From what I read about CSS modules, the style isolation provides some guard rails to prevent things like random bits of global style or having colliding rules all over the place. This makes a lot of sense, but even on huge projects, I never really have those problems. I've disciplined myself to pair a component file with a CSS file (MyComponent.jsx + MyComponent.css) and keep global styles to a minimum. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Components with separate styles - how to do?
    Any time you import CSS files into a module, that CSS becomes active on EVERY component in your entire project, so that's not really a good way to go about it. It essentially creates a tag inside the final rendered html with all of your CSS within it. If you have two CSS files, and they both have a class of .myClass then they will step on each other and cause bad things to happen to your... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why do bigger websites have the weirdest class and id names?
    They are probably using css modules. Source: over 2 years ago
  • No Caption..
    This may be a little more advanced but I'd also recommend looking into CSS modules. It basically allows you to scope your styles to individual elements preventing unwanted cascading, and simplifies naming conventions a lot (since the class names are now variables). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Garden (Clojure) and CSS Modules, you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

styled-components - styled-components is a visual primitive for the component age that also helps the user to use the ES6 and CSS to style apps.

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Autoprefixer - autoprefixer - Parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to rules by Can I Use

Loading...