stenciljs VS Shoelace.css

First a disclosure: I never actually used Stencil, only played with it a bit locally in a hello-world project while writing this post. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

This is my main concern too. I don't understand why tools like this "pick a winner" with a specific framework instead of rendering to Web Components with a framework wrapper, or using something like Stencil[1] that can render to any framework. [1] https://stenciljs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

I was recently able to sit down with some of the core members of Ionic, who also created Stencil a toolchain for building Design Systems and Progressive Web Apps. We talked at great length how typically companies are approaching Ionic from a Design Team and need help building components. As a developer I wanted to talk about the Web Components that are used within the Design System first. There was a decent amount... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

A web component should do ONE thing whereas a JS framework is a whole ecosystem. I made a video player web component that could take in various inputs, with a torrent file being the most complex of them. I was then able to port it to Vue/React with StencilJS [0] (although it was good to go without). Just drop the `https://stenciljs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Examples like this bug me. The React example is using a high level abstraction, the web component is directly using the API. A more accurate example would show how those React calls eventually boil down to document.createElement() I don’t think the Web Components API was meant to be used directly all the time. You can use a framework like StencilJS: https://stenciljs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

Maybe someone can tell me what is better to use for a newbie: a framework or library of individual web components, like WebAwesome (former Shoelace), for example: https://shoelace.style. - Source: Hacker News / 15 days ago

HTMX gets all the hype right now, but there are other tools in the same vain, my favorite being Unpoly (https://unpoly.com). Together with Shoelace (https://shoelace.style) you get nice GUIs real fast, without the burden of complicated dependency management and build steps. Also, you don't have to write a lot of JS, just what is needed for small enhancements, as it was meant to be. Some might say the main drawback... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago

Hello HN, I'm releasing Hyperdiv (https://hyperdiv.io), a framework for rapidly developing reactive browser UIs in Python, with immediate-mode syntax and using Shoelace (https://shoelace.style) as its built-in component system. This short coding video will give you a good idea of what it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XJKfxaqvGE I wrote a brief article about the motivation and approach:... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

For example, all the following design systems can be used without tooling (some of them provide ready-to-use bundles, others can be used through import maps): Google's Material Web, Microsoft's Fluent UI, IBM's Carbon, Adobe's Spectrum, Nordhealth's Nord, Shoelace, etc. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

I wonder if https://shoelace.style/ is what @ch33zer is looking for? Web components often seem overlooked in this crazy dash complicated js frameworks. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago