Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Steel Bank Common Lisp VS ProxySQL

Compare Steel Bank Common Lisp VS ProxySQL and see what are their differences

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

ProxySQL logo ProxySQL

ProxySQL: high-performance, GPL licensed MySQL proxy. It supports hundreds of thousands of concurrent connections and can be multiplexed to hundreds of servers.
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24
  • ProxySQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-23

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

ProxySQL videos

#ProxySQL Use Case Scenarios - #ProxySQL #Database Tutorial - René Cannaò - #Percona Live 2017

More videos:

  • Review - ProxySQL Use Case Scenarios / Alkin Tezuysal (Percona)
  • Review - Inexpensive Datamasking for MySQL with ProxySQL - data anonymization for developers

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Steel Bank Common Lisp and ProxySQL)
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
MySQL Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Steel Bank Common Lisp and ProxySQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ProxySQL should be more popular than Steel Bank Common Lisp. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: about 1 year ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

ProxySQL mentions (10)

  • Save Cost on RDS Data Transfer - Internet - Out
    Another option could be ProxySQL, where you can cache queries on the ProxySQL server. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Is replication between v5.1 and v8 possible?
    Also, if you're not using it yet, I can recommend looking at ProxySQL to do your read-write/read-only failover controls. Source: over 1 year ago
  • SSL Termination for SQL
    What are the recommendations here? I took a look into ProxySQL and it looks like since v2, it can do frontend and backend SSL connections. I have it locally working on a docker setup. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Business complexity with performance
    DB: Split you write-read operations. You may scale read as needed. Write operations can be slow if you have too many indices, so make sure to use only the ones you really need. Your DBMS may have some configuration to optimise, for example in MySQL if you do NOT need ACID compliance you can set innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2 to achieve better write speed. For MySQL you should also look into https://proxysql.com/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Advanced caching mechanisms using distributed locks and async pub/sub systems.
    A Layer-7 Database Load Balancer is optional here. An L7-DBLB can be used for various use cases (eg: ProxySQL). One or more database instances handle queries from the web server. A Client-side DB query/connection load balancing can also be used instead of an L7-DBLB according to the use case of the application. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Steel Bank Common Lisp and ProxySQL, you can also consider the following products

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Gonarch Tech - MySQL High Availability as a service

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

PostgREST - Automatic REST API for Any Postgres Database

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

MariaDB MaxScale - We are the company behind #MariaDB, the fastest growing #opensource #database. Download MariaDB at https://t.co/DtYwuH0FOl.