Steel Bank Common Lisp VS bacon.js

Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

bacon.js

A small functional reactive programming lib for JavaScript.

Landing page //
2019-04-24

Landing page //
2019-09-17

Steel Bank Common Lisp

Website: sbcl.org
$ Details

Edit details

bacon.js

Website: baconjs.github.io
$ Details

Edit details

Steel Bank Common Lisp features and specs

Performance
Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is known for its high-performance execution due to its native code compiler, which optimizes and speeds up Lisp code execution significantly.
Standards Compliance
SBCL is largely standard-compliant with Common Lisp, ensuring that code written for SBCL is portable across other Common Lisp implementations.
Actively Maintained
The project is actively maintained and updated, which means it benefits from regular improvements, bug fixes, and up-to-date features.
Robust Debugging Tools
SBCL offers robust debugging tools and a powerful REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop), which aid developers in interactive programming and troubleshooting.
Free and Open Source
SBCL is open-source and available for free, which allows developers to use, modify, and distribute the software under the terms of the license.

Possible disadvantages of Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steep Learning Curve
For beginners, especially those unfamiliar with Lisp or functional programming paradigms, learning SBCL can be challenging.
Platform Dependency
While SBCL is available on multiple platforms, certain features and optimizations are specific to particular operating systems, which can affect portability.
Limited Built-in Libraries
SBCL does not come with a broad range of built-in libraries compared to some other modern languages, which may require additional effort for library management.
Verbose Syntax
Common Lisp, and by extension SBCL, is known for its verbose syntax, which can be cumbersome compared to newer, more concise programming languages.
Community Size
The SBCL community, while active, is smaller compared to those of other mainstream programming languages, potentially limiting the availability of resources and community support.

bacon.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

bacon.js videos

+ Add

Bacon.js for Breakfast: An intro to functional reactive programming

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Steel Bank Common Lisp and bacon.js)

bacon.js

Programming Language

74 74%

Programming Language

26% 26

IDE

78 78%

IDE

22% 22

OOP

72 72%

OOP

28% 28

Text Editors

100 100%

Text Editors

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Steel Bank Common Lisp and bacon.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp should be more popular than bacon.js. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
A few newbie questions about lisp
Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: almost 2 years ago
[C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 2 years ago
Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 3 years ago
Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
> Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago

bacon.js mentions (1)

Static code generation DSL.
It would be awesome to develop something abstract and useful for usage as common PL (besides just solving specific problem), but it's really hard to develop a general purpose language (with memory management, mutations, etc.). For example, at my work I built reactive library mostly similar to Rx.js or Bacon.js, but with additional ability to compose different reactive systems on top of each other, so that... Source: over 3 years ago