Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CMU Common Lisp VS bacon.js

Compare CMU Common Lisp VS bacon.js and see what are their differences

Mixo
AI-powered website builder that helps you create professional sites in minutes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CMU Common Lisp logo CMU Common Lisp

CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

bacon.js logo bacon.js

A small functional reactive programming lib for JavaScript.
  • CMU Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-15
  • bacon.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-17

CMU Common Lisp features and specs

  • High-Performance Compiler
    CMU Common Lisp features an efficient native code compiler that can produce highly optimized code for the supported platforms, enhancing performance for computationally-intensive applications.
  • Extensive Library Support
    Includes a wide variety of libraries, providing functionality ranging from numerical computing to system interfacing, which allows developers to implement diverse applications without relying heavily on external packages.
  • Strong Typing System
    CMUCL provides a strong type system with good error detection and optimization capabilities that can help catch errors at compile-time and improve runtime performance.
  • Garbage Collection
    It includes an efficient garbage collector that manages memory naturally, minimizing manual intervention and reducing memory leaks and fragmentation in applications.
  • Comprehensive Integrated Development Environment
    CMUCL comes with an integrated environment which includes a debugger, inspector, and an interface for efficient development and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of CMU Common Lisp

  • Limited Platform Support
    The number of platforms explicitly supported by CMUCL is limited, which can be a constraint for developers who need to work across multiple or newer systems.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Newcomers might find CMUCL challenging due to its complexity and the intricate features specific to Lisp, requiring a steep learning curve compared to more modern languages and environments.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users find the documentation to be outdated or not comprehensive enough, making it difficult to get started and fully leverage the system's capabilities.
  • Limited Community Support
    The user and contributor community for CMUCL is relatively small compared to other languages and projects, which may result in less frequent updates and fewer third-party resources.
  • Complex Setup Process
    Initial setup and configuration of CMUCL can be cumbersome, especially for users not familiar with Lisp environments or those who require specific custom configurations.

bacon.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CMU Common Lisp videos

No CMU Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

bacon.js videos

+ Add

Bacon.js for Breakfast: An intro to functional reactive programming

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CMU Common Lisp and bacon.js)

CMU Common Lisp

bacon.js

Programming Language
70 70%
Programming Language
30% 30
IDE
73 73%
IDE
27% 27
OOP
68 68%
OOP
32% 32
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CMU Common Lisp and bacon.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bacon.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CMU Common Lisp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CMU Common Lisp yet. Tracking of CMU Common Lisp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

bacon.js mentions (1)

  • Static code generation DSL.
    It would be awesome to develop something abstract and useful for usage as common PL (besides just solving specific problem), but it's really hard to develop a general purpose language (with memory management, mutations, etc.). For example, at my work I built reactive library mostly similar to Rx.js or Bacon.js, but with additional ability to compose different reactive systems on top of each other, so that... Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CMU Common Lisp and bacon.js, you can also consider the following products

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

LIPS Scheme - Scheme based powerful lisp interpreter written in JavaScript

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

Racket Lang - Racket (formerly PLT Scheme) is a modern programming language in the Lisp/Scheme family, suitable...

Clozure Common Lisp - Clozure CL (often called CCL for short) is a free Common Lisp implementation with a long history.

Chicken - A portable and efficient cross-platform Scheme implementation that compiles to C.

Loading...