Static Site Boilerplate VS useHooks(🐠)

Static Site Boilerplate

A better workflow for building modern static websites.

useHooks(🐠)

One new React Hook recipe every day

Landing page //
2022-04-10

Landing page //
2023-08-17

Static Site Boilerplate

Website: staticsiteboilerplate.com
$ Details

Edit details

useHooks(🐠)

Website: usehooks.com
$ Details

Edit details

Static Site Boilerplate features and specs

Performance
Static Site Boilerplate is known for its fast loading times since it serves static files, which can be delivered quickly from a CDN.
Security
Static sites have fewer attack vectors compared to dynamic sites, reducing vulnerabilities like SQL injection and server-side attacks.
Scalability
Static Site Boilerplate inherently supports high scalability because static files can be easily replicated on multiple servers.
Simplicity
The framework is straightforward and simple to use, making it accessible to developers who want to create fast and efficient websites with minimal configuration.
No Server-Side Dependency
Since the output is purely static files, there's no need for any backend infrastructure or server management.

Possible disadvantages of Static Site Boilerplate

Limited Dynamic Functionality
Static Site Boilerplate is not ideal for websites that require server-side processing or real-time dynamic content as it does not support traditional backend server logic.
Content Management
Managing and updating content can be more cumbersome without a content management system (CMS) integrated into the workflow.
Build Time
With large sites, the build process can become time-consuming, as regenerating static files for every change takes time.
Initial Setup Complexity
For beginners, the initial setup and understanding of static site generation tools might seem complex compared to using a CMS.
Limited Interactivity
While possible to enhance with JavaScript, static sites inherently don't support highly interactive elements natively without additional scripting.

useHooks(🐠) features and specs

Comprehensive Resource
useHooks provides a wide range of hooks with clear explanations and examples, making it a great resource for developers who want to learn about React Hooks or need a quick reference.
Easy to Understand
The website is designed to be easy to navigate, with simple and straightforward examples. This makes it accessible to both beginner and experienced developers who are looking for practical implementations of hooks.
Community-Driven
The useHooks site and its associated GitHub repository often incorporate contributions from the React community, ensuring a diverse and up-to-date set of hooks that cover a wide array of use cases.

Possible disadvantages of useHooks(🐠)

Limited Depth
While useHooks provides a good overview and practical examples, it might not delve deeply into complex use cases or advanced hook usage that some developers may require for intricate applications.
Not Official Documentation
useHooks is a third-party resource and not the official React documentation from Facebook, so while it can be extremely helpful, it might not always reflect the most up-to-date practices as per the official standards.
Dependency on External Content
Being a community-driven project, the variety and quality of hooks available may depend on contributed content, which means there might be inconsistencies or varying levels of completeness across different hooks.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Static Site Boilerplate and useHooks(🐠))

useHooks(🐠)

Developer Tools

60 60%

Developer Tools

40% 40

Design Tools

100 100%

Design Tools

0% 0

Development Tools

31 31%

Development Tools

69% 69

React

100 100%

React

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Static Site Boilerplate and useHooks(🐠). For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, useHooks(🐠) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Static Site Boilerplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Static Site Boilerplate yet. Tracking of Static Site Boilerplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

useHooks(🐠) mentions (22)

React Hooks Essentials
If you're interested in diving deeper into hooks or exploring useful custom hooks for your projects, I highly recommend checking out UseHooks.com. It’s a fantastic resource with tons of practical custom hooks that you can use and learn from. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
React Custom Hooks: Crafting Reusable and Clean Code Like a Pro
// https://usehooks.com/useLocalStorage Import { useState } from 'react'; // Hook Function useLocalStorage(key, initialValue) { // State to store our value // Pass initial state function to useState so logic is only executed once const [storedValue, setStoredValue] = useState(() => { if (typeof window === 'undefined') { return initialValue; } try { // Get from local storage by key ... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Adding a real feature to a project 🧛
The very first one I came across was a package called useHooks. It looked like a really cool package with tonnes of hooks to use, and useQueue was one of them. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Thoughts on useEffect ?
There are a bunch of library custom hooks, sometimes they encapsulate logic better, you should prefer them or build your own instead. Source: almost 2 years ago
Is using both observer.unobserve and observer.disconnect redundant
It’s been some time since I’ve worked with intersection observer, so I’m not entirely sure of the answer in this instance. That said, something I tend to do when I run into something like this is look at an implementation that already exists from something like usehooks.com. I find a reference implementation to be a useful sanity check for this sort of thing. Source: about 2 years ago