Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Static Site Boilerplate VS Intro.js

Compare Static Site Boilerplate VS Intro.js and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Static Site Boilerplate logo Static Site Boilerplate

A better workflow for building modern static websites.

Intro.js logo Intro.js

Simple Javascript framework for adding screen tips
  • Static Site Boilerplate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-10
  • Intro.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

Static Site Boilerplate features and specs

  • Performance
    Static Site Boilerplate is known for its fast loading times since it serves static files, which can be delivered quickly from a CDN.
  • Security
    Static sites have fewer attack vectors compared to dynamic sites, reducing vulnerabilities like SQL injection and server-side attacks.
  • Scalability
    Static Site Boilerplate inherently supports high scalability because static files can be easily replicated on multiple servers.
  • Simplicity
    The framework is straightforward and simple to use, making it accessible to developers who want to create fast and efficient websites with minimal configuration.
  • No Server-Side Dependency
    Since the output is purely static files, there's no need for any backend infrastructure or server management.

Possible disadvantages of Static Site Boilerplate

  • Limited Dynamic Functionality
    Static Site Boilerplate is not ideal for websites that require server-side processing or real-time dynamic content as it does not support traditional backend server logic.
  • Content Management
    Managing and updating content can be more cumbersome without a content management system (CMS) integrated into the workflow.
  • Build Time
    With large sites, the build process can become time-consuming, as regenerating static files for every change takes time.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    For beginners, the initial setup and understanding of static site generation tools might seem complex compared to using a CMS.
  • Limited Interactivity
    While possible to enhance with JavaScript, static sites inherently don't support highly interactive elements natively without additional scripting.

Intro.js features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Intro.js provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface for creating guided tours on websites, making it accessible for users with varying technical skills.
  • Customizable
    Intro.js is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the look and feel of the tour to match the existing design of their website.
  • Lightweight
    The library is lightweight, ensuring that adding it to a website does not significantly increase load times or affect performance.
  • Cross-Browser Support
    Intro.js supports all major browsers, ensuring a consistent experience for users regardless of their browser choice.
  • Rich API
    It offers a rich API, enabling developers to integrate the tool into their applications seamlessly and extend its functionality as needed.

Possible disadvantages of Intro.js

  • Limited Interactivity
    While Intro.js provides basic guided tours, it lacks advanced interactive features that might be needed for more complex walkthroughs.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    As a JavaScript library, Intro.js requires users to have JavaScript enabled in their browsers, which might not be the case for all users.
  • Potential for User Overload
    Overusing or poorly implementing Intro.js guides can overwhelm users, leading to reduced engagement or missed information.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Intro.js offers limited features compared to the paid plans, which may restrict use for developers not willing to pay for premium features.
  • Learning Curve
    While it is user-friendly, new users may encounter a learning curve when trying to implement advanced customizations or complex tours.

Static Site Boilerplate videos

No Static Site Boilerplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Intro.js videos

+ Add

Intro.js: Onboard New Users with a Quick Wizard

More videos:

  • Review - Add a Step-by-Step guide to your Website with intro.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Static Site Boilerplate and Intro.js)

Static Site Boilerplate

Intro.js

Developer Tools
82 82%
Developer Tools
18% 18
User Engagement
0 0%
User Engagement
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
User Onboarding And Engagement
0 0%
User Onboarding And Engagement
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Static Site Boilerplate and Intro.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Static Site Boilerplate and Intro.js

Static Site Boilerplate Reviews

We have no reviews of Static Site Boilerplate yet.
Be the first one to post

Intro.js Reviews

15 best user onboarding software you need to try in 2023
The free version offers tooltips and screen portion highlights, which might suffice if your app is relatively straightforward. However, Intro.js is designed to be cut and pasted into your app’s code to create onboarding functions it wouldn’t otherwise have. Therefore, you’ll still need to have built a basic onboarding workflow ready.
Source: www.marketermilk.com
8 Best Usetiful Alternatives and Competitors That Are More Professional
The onboarding elements are very limited, so any user onboarding designed with Intro.js will not be likely to satisfy every need of a user.
Source: userguiding.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Intro.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Static Site Boilerplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Static Site Boilerplate yet. Tracking of Static Site Boilerplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Intro.js mentions (15)

  • 7 best product tour JavaScript libraries for frontend apps
    Intro.js is an open source JavaScript library that provides an easy way to create simple and effective product tours. It has an approximate file size of 12.5 KB, so it’s a lightweight library that makes building simple walkthroughs easy: One of the key features of Intro.js is its customizability. It allows you to tailor your tours to align with your application's branding by offering various themes and... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Guided Tours Solution for Your Web Application
    Intro.js like the others offers a rich set of features such as customizable steps and tooltips, keyboard navigation, theming, progress indicators and more. Like others, this library also has extensive documentation. Intro.js has open source licence under AGPL v3 and a commercial licence with different price plans. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Need Help With Website Guide
    Intro.js might be what you’re looking for. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Button pop up with Java and CSS
    Everything in the browser works with just CSS, JavaScript and HTML. There are JavaScript libraries for things like you are describing, if you are able to customize your site with JS - you should be able to use some of them. For example this one: https://introjs.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How come 1 cookie expires and the other one is not?
    For context, I'm using introjs to make a small tour in my website in 2 different pages. I'm making a cookie wheather a user has visited the page so I can only show the tour only once. My issue is that one cookie sets up with an expiration of 400 days as its supposed to be and the other one stays Session only but both are made from the exact same function with the exacth same parameters. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Static Site Boilerplate and Intro.js, you can also consider the following products

React Boilerplate - Offline-first, highly scalable foundation for your next app

ShepherdJS - Guide your users through a tour of your app.

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

UserGuiding - Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement.

React Milkshake - React boilerplate to kickstart your next projects.

Appcues - Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.

Loading...