Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Static.app VS surge.sh

Compare Static.app VS surge.sh and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Static.app logo Static.app

Static.app is the easiest way to host a static HTML website online.

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.
  • Static.app Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20

Static.app features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Static.app offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of deploying static websites, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing users to host their static websites at no cost with basic features, which is ideal for small projects and personal use.
  • Fast Deployment
    The platform enables quick deployment of static sites, ensuring that changes can be published without long waiting times, enhancing productivity and responsiveness.
  • Integrated CDN
    Static.app includes a built-in Content Delivery Network (CDN), which helps in delivering content swiftly across the globe, improving load times and performance for end users.
  • Version Control Integration
    It offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, allowing users to automate the deployment process directly from their repositories.

Possible disadvantages of Static.app

  • Limited Dynamic Content
    As a service specifically for static websites, Static.app does not support dynamic content or server-side scripting, which may limit its use for more complex web applications.
  • Feature Limitations
    Compared to other platforms, some users may find that Static.app lacks advanced features necessary for larger or more complex web projects, making it more suitable for simpler sites.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Tools
    Users often need to rely on third-party tools or services for features beyond static hosting, such as form handling or database interactions, adding potential complexity.
  • Limited Customization
    Customization options may be limited on Static.app, particularly for users who wish to have extensive control over server configurations or need specific developers’ tools.

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

Static.app videos

How to Host your Static Website? Hosting Review - Static.app

surge.sh videos

Introducing Surge

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Static.app and surge.sh)
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
100% 100
Image Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Website Builder
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Static.app and surge.sh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, surge.sh should be more popular than Static.app. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Static.app mentions (7)

  • How to use QuaggaJS – a barcode scanner example for your website or web app
    To test your new app on your phone, you need to deploy it to a server. If you don’t have a web server ready, you can prototype your site using services like Static.app by executing the following steps:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: Export to Airtable from Static HTML Forms
    Hey everyone! We’re excited to announce that last week we released an Airtable integration for our static forms on https://static.app/ What does this mean for you? Now, you can easily collect form data by adding a simple code snippet to your static pages: ... Once that’s in place, all you need to do is connect Airtable, and you’ll start receiving your form submissions directly in your... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Finish Your Projects
    You mentioned tiny hosting; I recommend trying https://static.app/ as they offer unlimited traffic, which could benefit your projects as they grow. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Zine: A Static Site Generator Written in Zig
    Could it be preview and hosted on https://static.app/ ? - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Statichost.eu – privacy-first static site hosting
    Why is better than for example https://static.app/ or netlify? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

surge.sh mentions (26)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Static.app and surge.sh, you can also consider the following products

tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

ezihost.org - Ezihost: the easiest way to upload and share your work online. Share your PDFs, landing pages, website, projects, designs, proposals and more in seconds, for free.

Staclo.host - The easiest way to host your static page

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

bantam.host - Upload anything and instantly share it on your own domain with professional, client-ready links that last exactly as long as you need.