Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

StableBit DrivePool VS mergerfs

Compare StableBit DrivePool VS mergerfs and see what are their differences

StableBit DrivePool logo StableBit DrivePool

State of the art, file based drive pooling software.

mergerfs logo mergerfs

mergerfs is a union filesystem geared towards simplifing storage and management of files across...
  • StableBit DrivePool Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-30
  • mergerfs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

StableBit DrivePool features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    StableBit DrivePool offers a straightforward and user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to create and manage storage pools without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • File Duplication
    It provides file duplication features which allow critical files to be stored on multiple physical drives, enhancing data redundancy and protection against drive failures.
  • Flexibility
    Users can add or remove drives from the pool easily without losing data or needing to reconfigure the system, offering enhanced flexibility in storage management.
  • No Drive Formatting Required
    Existing drives do not need to be formatted to be added to a pool, which helps retain existing data and reduces setup time.
  • Compatibility
    StableBit DrivePool works well with other tools and supports a wide range of drive types, such as NTFS and ReFS, making it compatible with various setups.

Possible disadvantages of StableBit DrivePool

  • Cost
    Unlike some free alternatives, StableBit DrivePool is a paid software, which may not be ideal for users with budget constraints.
  • No Built-in RAID
    It lacks built-in RAID configurations, which may be a downside for users looking for traditional RAID solutions for performance improvements.
  • Windows Only
    The software is available only for Windows, limiting its utility for users who run other operating systems like Linux or macOS.
  • Reliance on Software
    Being a software solution, system performance may vary depending on system specs, and users need to ensure the software is running for the pool to function correctly.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Some advanced features found in traditional NAS or SAN solutions, such as block-level deduplication, are not available, which might be a limitation for enterprise use.

mergerfs features and specs

  • Flexibility
    mergerfs offers a flexible way to merge multiple filesystems or drives into a single virtual pool, allowing users to utilize and manage disparate storage resources effectively.
  • Configurable Behavior
    It provides a highly configurable set of options, granting users control over how files are distributed, accessed, and managed within the pool. This includes options for policies regarding read-write actions, path-preservation, and space allocation.
  • FUSE-based
    Being a FUSE-based solution, mergerfs does not require kernel-level modifications, making it easier to install and use on various UNIX-like operating systems.
  • Snapshot and Backup Friendliness
    Files are stored on the underlying filesystems in a normal manner, which makes mergerfs compatible with snapshot and backup tools that work at the file level.
  • Active Development
    mergerfs is actively maintained and updated, ensuring it remains compatible with new operating system versions and receives bug fixes and feature enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of mergerfs

  • Single Point of Failure
    As with any pooled storage, if the point where mergerfs is mounted fails or becomes unstable, access to the merged data can be affected, representing a potential single point of failure.
  • FUSE Performance Overhead
    While FUSE provides flexibility and ease of use, it tends to introduce a performance overhead compared to kernel-based filesystem solutions, which can impact the speed of data operations.
  • Complexity in Configuration
    For users unfamiliar with filesystem behaviors and configurations, setting up and tuning mergerfs can be complex and may require a learning curve to fully leverage its features.
  • No Native RAID Support
    mergerfs itself does not provide redundancy or fault tolerance like traditional RAID systems, which means users need to implement additional solutions if data redundancy is required.
  • No Built-in Encryption
    mergerfs does not include built-in encryption features, so users requiring encrypted storage will need to rely on underlying filesystem capabilities or external tools.

StableBit DrivePool videos

Cord cutting solution using PlayOn, Stablebit Drivepool, and Stablebit Scanner

mergerfs videos

No mergerfs videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to StableBit DrivePool and mergerfs)
Cloud Storage
62 62%
38% 38
Cloud Computing
61 61%
39% 39
Storage
61 61%
39% 39
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using StableBit DrivePool and mergerfs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mergerfs should be more popular than StableBit DrivePool. It has been mentiond 87 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

StableBit DrivePool mentions (36)

  • Data storage solution for "archival" purposes.
    I pool the drives with DrivePool and I run backups with Bvckup2. Easy peasy. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Future storage options
    Whichever direction you go in you'll probably want this if on windows: https://stablebit.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to make the most out of my storage
    I have a folder on my desktop setup with syncthing so files get copied over to my desktop as soon as they've downloaded on the mini or when my pc boots up. The mini's Jellyfin instance also watches the downloads so I can stream things to my phone or TV as soon as they've downloaded. Once a week or so I boot up the external enclosure and copy over everything I want to keep. The external drives are pooled with... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • New Drives - To RAID or Not
    You could have a look at DrivePool (https://stablebit.com/). It enables you to pool virtually endless drives without the hassle of assigning to folders and exposes all of them to applications as just one drive (it has other features as well). Should a single drive fail, then the Pool will go into read-only mode until you correct the issue (which could be removing the drive from the Pool, you'll simply lose the... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What's a really niche tool you use that you can't live without?
    Drivepool : https://stablebit.com/ ! This one definitvely change the way I manage my storage. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

mergerfs mentions (87)

  • Mergerfs and Snapraid installation
    I am planning to use ubuntu server, and I would like to ask an advice: according to snapraid's download page and mergerfs' github page, it seems to be suggested to download directly their source instead of using ubuntu's package manager. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Merge/Raid HDD documentation
    It seems similar to mergerfs https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs . I havent gone through any code to verify but this is what it seems like. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Can Rclone be reliably used as a R/W cache or is there something better suited to that task?
    Something else to try is mergerfs, https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Looking for a solution to merge storage accross WAN
    I use mergerfs for my Google drive, Dropbox and local drives to appear as a single folder structure on my server so my plex doesn't require multiple mappings. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Unpackerr and Hardlinks, help needed
    Your paths are "fine", but they're not great. If you have multiple drives, you might also be interested in mergerfs to skoosh them all into "one" path, like /merge. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing StableBit DrivePool and mergerfs, you can also consider the following products

btrfs - Btrfs is a modern copy on write (CoW) filesystem for Linux aimed at implementing advanced features...

Greyhole - Greyhole is an application that uses Samba to create a storage pool of all your available hard drives, and allows you to create redundant copies of the files you store, in order to prevent data loss when part of your hardware fails.

mhddfs - The driver combines a several mount points into the single one.

Drive Bender - Drive Bender, class leading storage pooling technology

Liquesce - My Project discovery's / ramblings and techie stuff I deal with by Simon Coghlan

Unraid - Simplicity. Flexibility. Scalability. Modularity. Unraid empowers you to build the system you’ve always wanted using your preferred hardware, software, and operating systems.