Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Spring Boot VS Apache Wicket

Compare Spring Boot VS Apache Wicket and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Spring Boot logo Spring Boot

Create Spring-powered, production-grade applications and services with absolute minimum fuss

Apache Wicket logo Apache Wicket

HelloWorld demonstrates the basic structure of a web application in Wicket. A Label component is used to display a message on the home page for the application. In all the Wicket examples, you have to put all files in the same package directory.
  • Spring Boot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • Apache Wicket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22

Spring Boot features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    Spring Boot simplifies the process of setting up and developing new Spring applications with a range of out-of-the-box configurations and defaults.
  • Microservices Support
    Ideal for developing microservices architecture thanks to its embedded servers, simplified setup, and streamlined deployment process.
  • Strong Community and Ecosystem
    Backed by a large and active community, and supported by a wide variety of extensions and plugins, enhancing its capability and support.
  • Embedded Servers
    Supports embedded servers such as Tomcat, Jetty, and Undertow, which simplifies deployment and reduces configuration complexity.
  • Auto-Configuration
    Automatically configures most of the application’s components, reducing the need for manual setup and configuration.
  • Easy Integration
    Facilitates easy integration with various data sources, messaging systems, and other enterprise systems via Spring’s extensive ecosystem.
  • Production-Ready Features
    Includes various production-ready features like health checks, metrics, externalized configuration, and monitoring, making it easy to manage applications in production.

Possible disadvantages of Spring Boot

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its benefits, Spring Boot has a complex learning curve for beginners due to its extensive range of features and options.
  • Resource Consumption
    Spring Boot applications can sometimes be resource-intensive, potentially leading to higher costs in terms of memory and CPU usage.
  • Complexity in Large Projects
    While Spring Boot is great for simpler projects, it can become overly complex and harder to manage in very large applications with numerous dependencies and configurations.
  • Limited Flexibility with Embedded Servers
    While using embedded servers is convenient, it can also limit flexibility and control over server configuration and behaviors compared to standalone server setups.
  • Dependency Management
    Although auto-configuration is a significant advantage, it can sometimes lead to confusion or conflicts in dependency management, making troubleshooting more challenging.
  • Performance Overhead
    The auto-configuration and abstraction layers, while simplifying development, can introduce performance overhead, which might not be desirable in high-performance and fine-tuned applications.

Apache Wicket features and specs

  • Component-based architecture
    Apache Wicket follows a component-based architecture, allowing developers to create reusable components that can be easily maintained and improved over time.
  • POJO-driven development
    Wicket promotes Plain Old Java Object (POJO) development, which simplifies the creation of web applications by reducing the need for extensive XML configurations and boosting productivity with familiar Java paradigms.
  • HTML-centric design
    The framework allows developers to start with pure HTML and then add dynamic behavior, leading to cleaner separation of concerns and easier markup manipulation.
  • Strong type checking
    Wicket provides strong type checking at compile time, which leads to fewer runtime errors and increases code safety and reliability.
  • Built-in AJAX support
    Wicket seamlessly integrates AJAX functionality, allowing developers to create rich internet applications with minimal effort.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Wicket

  • Steep learning curve
    The component-based approach and the specific conventions used in Wicket might require a significant learning period, especially for those who are new to component-driven web frameworks.
  • Less popularity
    Although Wicket has a dedicated community, it is not as widely adopted as some other Java web frameworks, which might result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations.
  • Statefulness
    Wicket's stateful nature can lead to increased memory usage and potentially slower performance compared to stateless web frameworks, which might be important for applications with a large number of concurrent users.
  • Complexity in large applications
    As the size and scope of a Wicket application grow, the complexity of managing components and their interactions can also increase, making it harder to maintain without careful planning and architecture.

Spring Boot videos

No Spring Boot videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Wicket videos

Apache wicket: 1 start

More videos:

  • Review - Apache wicket: 12 LifeCycle

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Spring Boot and Apache Wicket)
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
No Code
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Spring Boot and Apache Wicket. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Spring Boot and Apache Wicket

Spring Boot Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Spring Boot — Java developers’ shortcut to a galaxy of applications. It’s a leap forward, ditching the boilerplate, no longer about “all the setup”, it’s about “all the creation”.

Apache Wicket Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
Tapestry is a component-based Java framework with which you can create scalable web applications. Its focus on reusable components makes it architecturally similar to Jakarta Faces and Apache Wicket (see both above). Like Struts and Wicket, Tapestry is also a project of the Apache Software Foundation.
Source: raygun.com
10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
Apache Wicket is a component-based application development framework developed by Jonathan Locke. It is one of the most recently developed Java frameworks.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Wicket seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Spring Boot mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Spring Boot yet. Tracking of Spring Boot recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Wicket mentions (10)

  • Show HN: Latudio – a language acquisition app with a listening-oriented approach
    - like Sentences exercise, but you can select your own set of sentences. You can also set goals and view statistics about your progress. None of this would be possible without the great help from hundreds of our contributors [3], who translated, mapped and recorded content. All the content you find in the app was reviewed multiple times by several people and recordings are made by native speakers. No story in the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • We're breaking up with JavaScript front ends
    Sort of sounds like Apache Wicket (https://wicket.apache.org/). I used it for a few projects in the mid-late 2000s. I really liked it being server side and the concept of having object-oriented HTML (code paired with HTML snippets). I haven't had a need to use it since 2014, so haven't kept up with the project. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Can I use Java to build a website?
    You can use Java for Backend and Frontend. A relative new kid on the block for Frontend is Qute. The general keyword you are searching for is Java Templating Engine. Specific examples would be Thymeleaf or FreeMarker. There are some framework, which offer a lot more than templating like Vaadin or Wicket. Some are just specifications like Jakarta Faces with some of their implementations MyFaces or Mojarra. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Getting back into Java after 12-15 years away?
    Perhaps, a good competitor for JSF is Apache Wicket. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Options for high level front-end frameworks for Java developers
    I have used https://wicket.apache.org/ in the past and I think it matches your needs. It's a simple mvc that focuses on the actual java code writing and uses html only on the layout of your components in your page. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Spring Boot and Apache Wicket, you can also consider the following products

QuickBase - Quickbase provides a no-code operational agility platform that enables organizations to improve operations through real time insights and automation across complex processes and disparate systems. ​​

Grails - An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM

Konfigure - APARTMENTS | VILLA | WORKSPACE | RETAIL

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

Metavine Platform - Metavine Platform is a comprehensive Platform-as-a-Service that help businesses build agility and compete effectively in the digital world by enabling them to iterate and create apps quickly.

Apache Struts - Apache Struts is an open-source web application framework for developing Java EE web applications.