Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Spck Editor VS MIT License

Compare Spck Editor VS MIT License and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Spck Editor logo Spck Editor

A full-fledged, embeddable, online editor for private, offline web projects.

MIT License logo MIT License

A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Not present
  • MIT License Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Spck Editor videos

+ Add

Best code editor for Android - Spck Editor

MIT License videos

+ Add

MIT License-Good or Bad? What MIT Licence means? Can MIT license be used commercially? #mit #tsg

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Spck Editor and MIT License)

Spck Editor

MIT License

Programming
100 100%
Programming
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Spck Editor and MIT License. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MIT License seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Spck Editor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Spck Editor yet. Tracking of Spck Editor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

MIT License mentions (4)

  • Show HN: Stanchion – Column-oriented tables in SQLite
    Question: Why do you choose LGPL-3.0? For many, of the most attractive features of SQLite is its license (or should I say lack thereof). I realise some people view public domain as legally problematic. I think the best answer for that is public-domain equivalent licenses such as 0BSD [0] or MIT-0 [1] – technically still copyrighted, but effectively not. (There are other, possibly more well-known options such as... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
    There's also another OSI approved "zero" license called MIT-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Go from Idea to Prototype under 20 seconds
    Probably a MIT-0 header will make people less worried to use the code. Take a look at https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/ https://github.com/aws/mit-0. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Just going to put this here.
    There's even a variant of the license called 'MIT No Attribution License' that has this specific clause removed (just in case you aren't convinced that the clause does cover attribution): https://github.com/aws/mit-0. Source: 11 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Spck Editor and MIT License, you can also consider the following products

JSitor - Test your NodeJS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML online with JSitor code editor.

Simplified BSD License - Also known as the "2-clause" BSD license, this is a simplified version of an open source license created at the University of California Berkley.

CodePen - A front end web development playground.

GPLv2 - Created for the GNU project, the GNU General Public License version 2 is the most popular free software license.

JS Bin - Sample of the bin:

AGPL - GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.

Loading...