Software Alternatives & Reviews

MIT License VS AGPL

Compare MIT License VS AGPL and see what are their differences

MIT License logo MIT License

A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

AGPL logo AGPL

GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.
  • MIT License Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • AGPL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

MIT License videos

MIT License-Good or Bad? What MIT Licence means? Can MIT license be used commercially? #mit #tsg

AGPL videos

Why Won't My Company Let Me Use AGPL Software?

More videos:

  • Review - AGPL Artificial Boxwood Hedge Wall with Dark Gray Stainless Steel Planter Box(64" H review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MIT License and AGPL)
Productivity
56 56%
44% 44
Code Collaboration
54 54%
46% 46
Tech
53 53%
47% 47
AI
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using MIT License and AGPL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MIT License seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MIT License mentions (4)

  • Show HN: Stanchion – Column-oriented tables in SQLite
    Question: Why do you choose LGPL-3.0? For many, of the most attractive features of SQLite is its license (or should I say lack thereof). I realise some people view public domain as legally problematic. I think the best answer for that is public-domain equivalent licenses such as 0BSD [0] or MIT-0 [1] – technically still copyrighted, but effectively not. (There are other, possibly more well-known options such as... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
    There's also another OSI approved "zero" license called MIT-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: Go from Idea to Prototype under 20 seconds
    Probably a MIT-0 header will make people less worried to use the code. Take a look at https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/ https://github.com/aws/mit-0. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Just going to put this here.
    There's even a variant of the license called 'MIT No Attribution License' that has this specific clause removed (just in case you aren't convinced that the clause does cover attribution): https://github.com/aws/mit-0. Source: 11 months ago

AGPL mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AGPL yet. Tracking of AGPL recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MIT License and AGPL, you can also consider the following products

Simplified BSD License - Also known as the "2-clause" BSD license, this is a simplified version of an open source license created at the University of California Berkley.

GPLv2 - Created for the GNU project, the GNU General Public License version 2 is the most popular free software license.

Creative Commons - The Creative Commons is a collection of licenses that allow content creators to adjust the restrictions that they place on their work.

The Unlicense - The Unlicense is a template for disclaiming copyright monopoly interest in software you've written; in other words, it is a template for dedicating your software to the public domain.

Premiumbeat - Premiumbeat.com provides high quality Royalty Free Music.

Open Science Framework - Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.