Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sourcery VS PullRequest.com

Compare Sourcery VS PullRequest.com and see what are their differences

Sourcery logo Sourcery

Sourcery reviews your code everywhere you work and automatically suggests improvements

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service
  • Sourcery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-08-19
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

Sourcery features and specs

  • Code Improvement
    Sourcery provides automated suggestions to improve code quality by identifying and fixing issues such as code smells, redundancy, and complexity.
  • Increased Efficiency
    By automating repetitive tasks and code refactoring, Sourcery allows developers to focus on more complex and creative aspects of programming, thus increasing overall productivity.
  • Integration
    It integrates seamlessly with major code editors like VSCode and PyCharm, making it convenient for developers to incorporate it into their existing workflows without learning new software.
  • Real-time Feedback
    Sourcery provides real-time analysis and suggestions as you write your code, allowing immediate improvements without the need for additional manual reviews.

Possible disadvantages of Sourcery

  • Language Limitation
    Sourcery primarily supports Python, making it less useful for projects involving other programming languages.
  • False Positives
    Like many automated tools, it might sometimes suggest changes that are not ideal or that developers may not agree with, possibly leading to wasted time reviewing and rejecting certain recommendations.
  • Dependency on Tool
    Relying heavily on Sourcery might reduce a developer's ability to manually identify and fix code issues, potentially impacting skill development and problem-solving capability.
  • Cost
    While Sourcery offers a free tier, more extensive features are part of a paid plan, which may not be feasible for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sourcery and PullRequest.com)
Developer Tools
50 50%
50% 50
AI
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Sourcery and PullRequest.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sourcery should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sourcery mentions (5)

  • Ask HN: How do you get an open-source product noticed by developers?
    In my experience, the developer tools that really catch on do so via word of mouth. For example, our whole team recently adopted https://sourcery.ai/ (not an ad) because one developer tried it and hyped it up to everyone else who also liked it. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Google Python Style Guide
    To those that wish to automate a subset of these conventions, there is a tool called Sourcery[1] that I, personally, am a huge fan of! Not only does it have a large set of default rules[2], but it can also allow you to write your own rules that may be specific to your team or organization, and as mentioned it can enable you to follow Google's Python style guide as well[3]. There are some refactorings that Sourcery... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • What are the best Python libraries to learn for beginners?
    During development, tools like Sourcery could show you improvements for code quality. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Quick wins in improving your Python codebase health
    One of the first tools I install when setting up my Python dev environment is Sourcery. This still uses AI/ML to suggest code improvements to your Python code, but unlike GitHub's Copilot, it won't write code for you. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Making Python Code Idiomatic by Automatic Refactoring Non-Idiomatic Python Code with Pythonic Idioms
    Looks downright wicked https://sourcery.ai/. Source: over 2 years ago

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sourcery and PullRequest.com, you can also consider the following products

Sweep AI - AI junior dev: transform bugs & feature requests into code

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Cxxdroid - Cxxdroid – C++ compiler IDE for mobile development is an educational-oriented application that is used to practice code editing and program writing, checking files, and many more with UI designed with speed and usability of mind.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.