Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SourceHut VS RhodeCode

Compare SourceHut VS RhodeCode and see what are their differences

SourceHut logo SourceHut

Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, bug tracking, continuous integration, and more

RhodeCode logo RhodeCode

Enterprise source code management platform for behind-the-firewall Mercurial, Git & Subversion. Secure and Open Source.
  • SourceHut Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • RhodeCode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

SourceHut features and specs

  • Minimalistic Design
    SourceHut prides itself on simplicity and a minimalist interface, which makes it easy to navigate and reduces distractions.
  • Highly Configurable CI
    SourceHut offers a highly configurable continuous integration (CI) system that allows for a great deal of customization in build pipelines.
  • Focus on Free Software
    SourceHut places a strong emphasis on free and open-source software, aligning with the values of many developers in the community.
  • Fast Performance
    The lightweight nature of SourceHut's web interface enhances load times and overall performance.
  • Email-based Workflow
    The platform offers a unique email-based workflow for code review and patches, which can be more efficient for some developers.
  • Privacy-focused
    SourceHut emphasizes user privacy, avoiding tracking and invasive data collection.

Possible disadvantages of SourceHut

  • Learning Curve
    The unique email-based workflow and minimalist design might have a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Lack of Popular Integrations
    Unlike some other platforms, SourceHut does not support as many third-party integrations out of the box.
  • Paid Service
    SourceHut is primarily a paid service, which might be a barrier for some users, especially those looking for free options.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a relatively new and niche platform, SourceHut has a smaller user community, which can limit the availability of community support and resources.
  • Sparse Documentation
    The documentation available might be considered sparse compared to more established platforms, making it harder for new users to get started.
  • Fewer Built-in Features
    SourceHut has fewer built-in features compared to giants like GitHub or GitLab, which offer extensive integrated tools and services.

RhodeCode features and specs

  • Unified Repository Management
    RhodeCode supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories, providing a flexible solution for organizations using multiple version control systems.
  • Enhanced Security
    It includes fine-grained permissions and access controls, ensuring robust security for repositories and code bases.
  • Enterprise Features
    It offers features like audit logs, compliance support, and LDAP/Active Directory integration, which are crucial for enterprise environments.
  • Integrations
    RhodeCode integrates with popular tools like Jira, Jenkins, and Slack, enhancing collaboration and workflow automation.
  • Self-hosted
    Being self-hosted, RhodeCode provides full control over data, which is essential for organizations with strict compliance or security requirements.
  • Community and Support
    RhodeCode offers a strong community support and comprehensive documentation, along with professional support options.

Possible disadvantages of RhodeCode

  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining a self-hosted instance can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring experienced personnel.
  • Cost
    While there is a community edition, the enterprise edition with the full feature set can be expensive.
  • User Interface
    Some users might find the user interface less intuitive compared to modern cloud-based solutions like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Performance
    Depending on the server infrastructure, performance might lag when handling very large repositories or a high number of concurrent users.
  • Limited Cloud Options
    Unlike some competitors, RhodeCode does not offer a fully managed cloud-hosted version, which could be a drawback for those looking for minimal maintenance.
  • Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with hosted version control systems might face a steep learning curve when adopting RhodeCode.

SourceHut videos

System Crafters Live! - What is GNU? • Is Sourcehut the future? • Q&A

More videos:

  • Review - Building Natalie on OpenBSD with Sourcehut

RhodeCode videos

Introduction to RhodeCode - Part 1. Installation

More videos:

  • Review - Rhodecode issue 372

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SourceHut and RhodeCode)
Git
54 54%
46% 46
Code Collaboration
59 59%
41% 41
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
44 44%
56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using SourceHut and RhodeCode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SourceHut seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 58 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SourceHut mentions (58)

  • Forgejo: A self-hosted lightweight software forge
    b) The barrier to create accounts on yet another platform to contribute. In that regards I find the original way of just using email's to send patches just such a brilliant idea, because at least it eliminates my second point completely. That's why I think sourcehut [0] is such a nice idea at least in theory. Though now you have to teach people not only how to use "git" but also hot to use "git" via email :D... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Ask HN: Anyonne tried alternative company models (like a co-op) for SaaS?
    Https://sourcehut.org/ is a sort of coop open source project and a SaaS with an interesting model. There is also https://opencollective.com/ which provides a platform for collective ownership of an online business. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Why GitHub Won
    If you just want an online repository, go with Sourcehut (https://sourcehut.org/). - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's Happenning with SourceHut?
    For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Using Git Offline
    Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

RhodeCode mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RhodeCode yet. Tracking of RhodeCode recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SourceHut and RhodeCode, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

GitBucket - GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Gogs - A painless self-hosted Git service written in Go