For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

A few comments in-line, but I don't want to "sell" anything to you, so just FWIW. > The amount of "gotchas" in this process and the tooling required just to use git + email seems insane to me. The base system is really, really simple, but there are some common rules/guidelines that just help when working together, and those are required for forge based workflows too (or do you like a single commit touching a dozen... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

> We're planning on expanding to support other forges, Just want to put in a request for SourceHut support in case it's not already on your list. Sometimes it gets overlooked in favor of the big corporate forges. https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

Https://sourcehut.org/ fits this pretty well. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

Years ago, when https://sourceforge.net was still a thing thing, they had a freshmeat subdomain for this sort of thing. I'm hoping this will be a better, more engaging way to achieve the same objectives--for Java projects. Source: over 1 year ago

Http://freshmeat.sourceforge.net/ "Content may be stale" indeed (from the header)... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago