Solana Pay VS Stripe Chargeback Protection

With Solana pay merchants will save the ~3% charged by payment processors. Https://solanapay.com/. Source: over 1 year ago

That is where CandyPay comes in. CandyPay lets you create NFTs with a no-code builder and also lets users easily claim them via Solana Pay on mobile without worrying about installing any browser extension or connecting their wallet. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Solana is undoubtedly one of the most innovative blockchain projects in the entire Web3 industry. You can make your own judgments on the recent exploit, previous slowdowns and other issues. But you cannot deny how fast the infrastructure is being built out. Just in the past few months, Solana has announced three groundbreaking pieces of news — the opening of a physical store called Solana Spaces, a new mobile... Source: over 1 year ago

Solana launched a cringe merch store but you can't use their payments system they themselves describe as "the digital commerce revolution", it's either credit card or PayPal:. Source: almost 2 years ago

I was very excited about Solana Pay[0] when it dropped last year, but it doesn't seem to have gotten much traction. 0. https://solanapay.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Yea, unfortunately Stripe doesn’t make these decisions. Couple things you could consider: * Adding additional verification steps like Stripe Identity * Requiring 3DS, which shifts loss liability in some cases to the card issuer * Using Stripe Checkout with Chargeback Protection: https://stripe.com/radar/chargeback-protection. It costs 0.4%, but you wouldn’t need to worry about losses at all (up to a certain volume... Source: almost 2 years ago

You could consider looking into using Chargeback Protection, which will add to your processing fee, but will protect you from loss from chargebacks on eligible transactions (i.e., purchase made via the Checkout). You won't have to provide evidence, you won't lose the money (up to a certain amount per year); it's essentially an insurance system. And from my reading of their docs, I don't think you'd have to deal... Source: about 2 years ago

I have seen companies out there that specialize in combatting chagebacks for businesses. Basically any chargeback that happens, the company takes care of disputing it. For a company like yourself that processes high dollar transactions/products/services, you may do well to seek such a company and use their service, get your own merchant account and stop using 3rd party processors. Stripe has a chargeback... Source: about 2 years ago

Stripe offers Payment Links [0], which makes it really easy to accept payments (just paste a link into your product page and handle a webhook serverside; a single href is adequate). They also have a separate "Checkout" offering [1], which requires some code client- and server-side to generate the page. So far, Stripe has been awesome for me selling $2.50/mo subscriptions [2], and as far as I know, suspicious... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Right, Apple is only providing the hardware and it requires to use a (partnered) processor, like Stripe, which was the example they used in their recent announcement. Stripe coincidentally sells chargeback protection as a service https://stripe.com/radar/chargeback-protection if that is a concern. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago