SocketCluster VS Apache Camel

SocketCluster Reviews

Apache Camel Reviews

SocketCluster mentions (8)

• The Sound of Software

  Recently, I added an AI-generated soundtrack to my open source project's home page https://socketcluster.io/ It seems unconventional at first but I distinctly remember about a decade ago when Adobe Flash was still broadly supported, many Flash websites had soundtracks. I think the reason why regular HTML websites didn't have them was because it was difficult to implement and internet was much slower so they had to... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago

• Backpressure explained – the resisted flow of data through software

  I wrote an async/await stream library for JavaScript/Node.js which supports backpressure management. It's heavily tested and used as part of SocketCluster (pub/sub SDK) https://socketcluster.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Is it a good practice to store web sockets connections on redis?

  If redis doesn't satisfy your requirements or you're unable to make it work using adaptor, SocketCluster is a great package for this https://socketcluster.io/. Source: 10 months ago

• Why messaging is much better than REST for inter-microservice communications

  Interesting how this feature set is pretty much exactly the same as offered by SocketCluster https://socketcluster.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• On the Unhappiness of Software Developers

  This resonates with me 100%. Every bit of unhappiness I've felt in my career so far has been caused by a bad manager. The main issue for me has been the final point you mentioned about "Imposed artificial limitations" - I cannot tell you the number of times that I've been forced to use an inefficient tool or do something in a sub-optimal or downright incorrect way (knowing that it would have to be re-written... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Apache Camel mentions (12)

• Ask HN: What is the correct way to deal with pipelines?

  "correct" is a value judgement that depends on lots of different things. Only you can decide which tool is correct. Here are some ideas: - https://camel.apache.org/ - https://www.windmill.dev/ Your idea about a queue (in redis, or postgres, or sqlite, etc) is also totally valid. These off-the-shelf tools I listed probably wouldn't give you a huge advantage IMO. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Why messaging is much better than REST for inter-microservice communications

  This reminds me more of Apache Camel[0] than other things it's being compared to. > The process initiator puts a message on a queue, and another processor picks that up (probably on a different service, on a different host, and in different code base) - does some processing, and puts its (intermediate) result on another queue This is almost exactly the definition of message routing (ie: Camel). I'm a bit doubtful... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Can I continuously write to a CSV file with a python script while a Java application is continuously reading from it?

  Since you're writing a Java app to consume this, I highly recommend Apache Camel to do the consuming of messages for it. You can trivially aim it at file systems, message queues, databases, web services and all manner of other sources to grab your data for you, and you can change your mind about what that source is, without having to rewrite most of your client code. Source: over 1 year ago

• S3 to S3 transform

  For a simple sequential Pipeline, my goto would be Apache Camel. As soon as you want complexity its either Apache Nifi or a micro service architecture. Source: over 1 year ago

• 🗞️ We have just released our JBang! catalog 🛍️

  🐪 Apache Camel : Camel JBang, A JBang-based Camel app for easily running Camel routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago