Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Snap.svg VS Three.js

Compare Snap.svg VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Snap.svg logo Snap.svg

Snap.svg is a javascript SVG library for the modern web.

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • Snap.svg Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-27
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

Snap.svg features and specs

  • Modern SVG Support
    Snap.svg is specifically designed for modern web standards and provides extensive support for SVG graphics, making it easier to create, modify, and animate SVG content.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a straightforward and user-friendly API, which simplifies the process of creating complex SVG graphics and animations even for developers with limited experience in SVG.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Snap.svg comes with comprehensive documentation and examples, which help developers quickly understand its capabilities and implement them efficiently.
  • Interactivity
    The library supports interactivity features, enabling developers to create rich, interactive SVG content by easily attaching event listeners to SVG elements.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Snap.svg is built to work well on all modern browsers, ensuring that your SVG content is accessible to a wide audience without compatibility issues.

Possible disadvantages of Snap.svg

  • Lack of Active Development
    As of now, Snap.svg is not actively maintained, which might lead to difficulties in finding support for new issues or updates that ensure compatibility with the latest web standards.
  • Performance Limitations
    While Snap.svg works well for many projects, it might not perform as efficiently as native solutions for highly demanding or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to larger, more widely used libraries, Snap.svg has a smaller community, which may result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party plugins being available.
  • Not Suitable for All Use Cases
    Although suitable for a wide range of SVG manipulations, Snap.svg might not cover very specific or advanced use cases, requiring developers to seek alternatives or custom solutions.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Snap.svg videos

No Snap.svg videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Snap.svg and Three.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
13 13%
87% 87
Charting Libraries
24 24%
76% 76
Flowcharts
13 13%
87% 87
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Snap.svg and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Snap.svg and Three.js

Snap.svg Reviews

8 Best Free and Open-Source Drawing Libraries in JavaScript
You can see how it performs with respect to Vanilla JS and Snap.svg on the homepage of the website. It is possible to create basic shapes and add them to the DOM using built-in functions. The library comes with all kinds of functions to manipulate the appearance of anything you draw on the screen. There is also support for event listeners so that you can implement...

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than Snap.svg. While we know about 248 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 9 mentions of Snap.svg. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Snap.svg mentions (9)

View more

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Snap.svg and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

SVG Porn - A collection of SVG Logos for developers

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.