Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

SML/NJ VS Poly/ML

Compare SML/NJ VS Poly/ML and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

SML/NJ logo SML/NJ

Standard ML of New Jersey: compiler and runtime environment with REPL

Poly/ML logo Poly/ML

The Poly/ML implementation of Standard ML – full multiprocessor support in the thread library and garbage collector, interactive debugger, fast compiler.
  • SML/NJ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-08-20
  • Poly/ML Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-07

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SML/NJ and Poly/ML)

SML/NJ

Poly/ML

Programming Language
52 52%
Programming Language
48% 48
OOP
52 52%
OOP
48% 48
Generic Programming Language
52 52%
Generic Programming Language
48% 48

User comments

Share your experience with using SML/NJ and Poly/ML. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Poly/ML seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SML/NJ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SML/NJ yet. Tracking of SML/NJ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Poly/ML mentions (2)

  • Simple JSON parser in c++, rust, ocaml, standard ml
    Once I got the parser ready in OCaml, I thought I port it to Standard ML, since it belong to the same ML language family. I was also curious on how well mlton could optimise it. The language lacks custom let bindings, so I resorted to use Result.bind manually. This makes code much less readable and more verbose. The standard library also lacks result type, so I had to come up with my own simple implementation.... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • The New OCaml Website
    > I hope something similar comes to common lisp. When you say "something similar", what are you thinking about? Simply this rather professional presentation, or something social, or something technical? Or the fact of a renaissance? Is this sort of revamp a cause or a symptom of a renaissance? For Common Lisp it's always seemed to me that SBCL (disclaimer: never used it, only read about it) is the "modern" option... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SML/NJ and Poly/ML, you can also consider the following products

MLton - MLton is an open-source, whole-program, optimizing Standard ML compiler

OCaml - (* Binary tree with leaves carrying an integer.

Loading...