Software Alternatives & Reviews

Smalltalk VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare Smalltalk VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Smalltalk logo Smalltalk

Smalltalk is an object-oriented programming (OOP) language. It is objects all the way down.

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • Smalltalk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-10
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Smalltalk and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Programming Language
54 54%
46% 46
OOP
61 61%
39% 39
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Smalltalk and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Smalltalk should be more popular than Steel Bank Common Lisp. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Smalltalk mentions (28)

  • Old version of offline Scratch that had a secret OS
    Also, it's not really an "operating system", nor was it implemented by the ST. It's just part of Squeak (you got the name right), the "engine" Scratch 1.x was made with (which lets you edit the code in the same window it's running in). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Alternatives to organizing code in files and folders?
    Just downloaded https://squeak.org/ to play around with this concept. I wonder if there is already a modern tool/suite for Node/Python inspired by Smalltalk... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • What are some important differences between the popular versions of OOP (e.g. Java, Python) vs. the purist's versions of OOP (e.g. Smalltalk)?
    AFAIK the major SmallTalk distributions are https://squeak.org/ and https://pharo.org/. I've heard that Pharo is more complex and "practical", while Squeak is more educational and beginner-friendly. But both stick to their roots with "everything is an object or method", extreme reflection, and integrated runtime/IDE. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What software stack to select for this boot to code computer?
    Your concept looks nice, it reminds me a bit of the Lisperati: https://www.hackster.io/news/the-lisperati1000-is-a-cyberdeck-terminal-dedicated-to-lisp-programming-bb564f2ffcff So, did you consider Lisp or maybe Smalltalk? Plan 9 or Inferno might also be options. Plan 9 comes in different variants, the "classic" one (with a Raspberry Pi port by Richard Miller) or 9front, an Inferno porting tutorial can be found at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Squeak Morphic Layers
    This repository contains multiple projects closely related to (hardware-accelerated) rendering in Squeak/Smalltalk. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 12 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Smalltalk and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Pharo - Pharo is a pure object-oriented programming language and a powerful environment, focused on...

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.