Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Skulpt VS Next.js

Compare Skulpt VS Next.js and see what are their differences

Skulpt logo Skulpt

Skulpt is an entirely in-browser implementation of Python.

Next.js logo Next.js

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
  • Skulpt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-08
  • Next.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-19

Skulpt features and specs

  • Client-side Execution
    Skulpt runs entirely in the browser, which eliminates the need for server-side execution and reduces server load. This makes Skulpt a good choice for educational tools where server resources may be limited.
  • Interactive Learning
    Since Skulpt can execute Python code in real-time within a web browser, it facilitates interactive learning experiences. This is particularly useful for educational platforms that teach Python programming.
  • No Installation Required
    Users do not need to install Python or any additional software to run Python code using Skulpt, which lowers the barrier for entry and makes it accessible for beginners.
  • Open Source
    Skulpt is open-source, allowing developers to contribute to its development, customize it for their needs, and trust in its transparency.

Possible disadvantages of Skulpt

  • Limited Python Feature Support
    Skulpt does not support all Python features and libraries, which can be limiting for users looking to execute more advanced or specific Python code.
  • Performance Limitations
    Because Skulpt executes code in the browser, its performance may not match native Python execution, particularly for computation-intensive tasks.
  • Browser Dependency
    Since Skulpt operates in a web browser, its functionality can be influenced by browser compatibility and updates, which can cause variability in performance and reliability.
  • Security Limitations
    Executing code client-side in the browser may expose it to certain security risks that server-side execution can mitigate, making it necessary to implement additional security measures.

Next.js features and specs

  • Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
    Next.js supports SSR, allowing pages to be rendered on the server-side before being sent to the client. This results in improved SEO and faster initial page loads.
  • Static Site Generation (SSG)
    Enables pre-rendering pages at build time, which can further improve performance and scalability while allowing for dynamic generation when needed.
  • API Routes
    Next.js allows you to build API endpoints directly in the application, simplifying the process of creating back-end services and endpoints.
  • File-Based Routing
    Offers a simple file-based routing mechanism where the file structure maps directly to the app’s routes, making it easier to manage and understand.
  • Automatic Code Splitting
    Automatically splits code at the page level, reducing the initial load time and improving performance by only loading necessary JavaScript.
  • TypeScript Support
    Built-in support for TypeScript, allowing developers to use static type checking and other TypeScript features easily.
  • Developer Experience
    Provides a great developer experience with features like fast refresh, hot reloading, and detailed error reporting.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Benefiting from the rich ecosystem of the React community and integrating well with other libraries and tools.
  • Internationalization
    Built-in support for internationalization helps developers build multilingual applications with ease.
  • Community and Support
    Strong community and extensive documentation provide ample support and resources for new and experienced developers alike.

Possible disadvantages of Next.js

  • Learning Curve
    The robust feature set of Next.js can present a steep learning curve for developers who are new to React or server-side rendering concepts.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Although Next.js aims for simplicity, complex projects may still require significant configuration and customization.
  • Performance Overhead
    SSR can introduce additional server load and latency compared to static site generators, especially under high traffic conditions.
  • Deployment Complexity
    Deploying Next.js applications that leverage SSR or API routes may be more complex and could require more sophisticated server infrastructure.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    If heavily relying on Next.js-specific features, moving away from the framework to another solution could require significant refactoring.
  • Bundle Size
    Without careful optimization, client-side bundle sizes can become large, negatively affecting the application’s performance.
  • Build Times
    For large applications, build times can be significant, impacting the development cycle and deployment times.
  • Dependencies
    Next.js introduces its own set of dependencies and tooling, which might complicate version management and compatibility with other tools.

Analysis of Next.js

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Next.js is considered a good framework. It is admired for its flexibility, developer experience, and ability to deliver high-performance applications. Its continuous updates and community support further enhance its standing as a reliable choice for building web applications.

Why this product is good

  • Next.js is a popular React framework known for its server-side rendering, static site generation, and API route features. It is built by Vercel and provides an optimized development experience with a focus on performance and SEO advantages. Its easy integration with various backends, built-in support for TypeScript, and capability to handle dynamic and static content efficiently make it a strong choice for modern web development.

Recommended for

  • Developers building SEO-friendly web applications
  • Teams focusing on performance optimization
  • Projects requiring server-side rendering or static site generation
  • Applications needing routing and API integration out of the box
  • Developers looking for a robust framework with TypeScript support

Skulpt videos

Modal Skulpt - 4 Voice Virtual Analog Synthesizer Review - Sonic LAB

More videos:

  • Review - DON'T BUY IT! - Skulpt Chisel Bodyfat Analyser
  • Review - Stimming reviews Modal Electronics' SKULPT and CRAFT 2.0 Synth (Electronic Beats TV)

Next.js videos

Next.js: The React Framework - JS Monthly - July 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Gatsby vs Next.js: Which does SSG Better?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Skulpt and Next.js)
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
1 1%
99% 99
OOP
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Skulpt and Next.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Skulpt and Next.js

Skulpt Reviews

We have no reviews of Skulpt yet.
Be the first one to post

Next.js Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
Next.js is a well-known platform most of you utilize to build a responsive website. However, if you are annoyed by its limited features, consider Next.js alternatives because flexibility and faster loading speed are always the top concerns of every developer. For this reason, you might need to read this article to explore the top 10 Nextjs Alternatives for the exciting world...
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
When it comes to building modern web applications, finding the right framework can be a game-changer. Next.js is often a top choice, but there are several Next.js alternatives worth considering.
10 Best Next.js Alternatives to Consider Today
For those who have been accustomed to the benefits of React Next.js, keeping an eye on the latest version is crucial. Next.js's continuous improvement and updates in Next.js enhance its capabilities, ensuring developers can access cutting-edge features and optimizations. Whether starting a new project or maintaining an existing Next.js website, staying informed about the...
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Next.js uses JavaScript and React components to create the UI. Next.js is influenced by React Router, Webpack, Node ecosystem, and community libraries. The feature that sets Next.js apart from other frameworks is its ability to automatically generate pages based on the file system structure of the project. For example, if there is a _posts folder in the root directory,...
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
Some of its top features include server-side rendering, automatic code splitting, client-side routing, built-in CSS support, static site generation and API routes. Overall, Next.JS is a powerful and flexible framework that provides developers with a simple and intuitive way to build complex React applications with ease. It is widely used in the React community and has a...
Source: www.bocasay.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Next.js seems to be a lot more popular than Skulpt. While we know about 1074 links to Next.js, we've tracked only 15 mentions of Skulpt. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Skulpt mentions (15)

  • What to do after building a basic HTML/CSS site?
    As for python being supported in the browser, I think you're looking for something like https://skulpt.org/. I haven't used it though, but you'll need to learn how to use libraries first. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Raspberry Pi Debuts a Code Editor for Young People: "Python is the preferred coding language for beginners (particularly young people), as it’s the most intuitive language utilized by professionals. For this reason, Raspberry Pi’s Code Editor uses Python (specifically the standard library and P5)."
    It's a simple editor, but looks like it would be good for beginners and should work on Chromebooks and mobile devices. It appears to be a React single page app that uses Skulpt behind the scenes. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Pointers? In My Python? It's More Likely Than You Think - Part 3: Object Lifetimes and Garbage Collection
    We ended Part 2 by asking the questions: once we've created an object x, how and why does its 'lifetime' end? In this article, we'll learn the answers by exploring how CPython frees objects from memory. CPython isn't the only implementation of Python - for example, there's Skulpt, which Anvil uses to run Python in the browser - but it's the one we'll focus on specifically for this article. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Intro to PyScript: Run Python in your web browser
    I currently use Skulpt for in-browser Python tutorials, how does this compare to that? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • I Tested PyScript — And You Can Literally Write Python Scripts In Your Browser
    It's great to see more options for Python in the browser but the ecosystem has existed for a while. If anyone is interested, there are some cool Python-in-the-browser implementations like Brython and Skulpt that are worth checking out. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Next.js mentions (1074)

  • I replaced Next.js for my application with this module 🔥
    But I want to say that this topic is clearly not new in 2025, I will not reveal anything supernatural here. HTMX and Alpine.js have already fully proven to everyone that this is not nonsense. I am just retelling everything, but with one interesting remark - this is the HMPL template language which is better than the previous two in some tasks. Next, I will describe why and how it will help you replace Next.js. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • How to add markdown to a Next.js project
    This article assumes the reader is a developer that knows their way around Markdown, TypeScript, React.js, and [Next.js] https://nextjs.org/). Familiarity with Tailwind-css would also be useful. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • The Rise of Hybrid Frameworks
    The popularisation of SSR among frontend developers can be largely attributed to the widespread adoption of frameworks with server-side rendering. These frameworks provide an elegant integration of SSR with modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks like React and Vue.js. Next.js, for instance, has become a de facto choice for many React developers seeking to leverage SSR's benefits without sacrificing the... - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Angular: Beyond the fog #1
    My only true recommendation would be to prefer React for mobile or SSR applications, as community projects (Expo for mobile and Next.js for SSR) are more mature and easier to set up. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • Generate Git action CI/CD pipeline using Amazon Q CLI
    This is a Next.js project bootstrapped with create-next-app. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Skulpt and Next.js, you can also consider the following products

Brython - Brython's goal is to replace Javascript with Python, as the scripting language for web browsers.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Transcrypt - Transcrypt is a Python to JavaScript transpiler.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

Nuxt.js - Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. It's a perfect static site generator.