Software Alternatives & Reviews

Simplified BSD License VS MIT License

Compare Simplified BSD License VS MIT License and see what are their differences

Simplified BSD License logo Simplified BSD License

Also known as the "2-clause" BSD license, this is a simplified version of an open source license created at the University of California Berkley.

MIT License logo MIT License

A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Simplified BSD License Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • MIT License Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Simplified BSD License videos

No Simplified BSD License videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

MIT License videos

MIT License-Good or Bad? What MIT Licence means? Can MIT license be used commercially? #mit #tsg

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Simplified BSD License and MIT License)
Productivity
43 43%
57% 57
Code Collaboration
43 43%
57% 57
Tech
45 45%
55% 55
Music
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Simplified BSD License and MIT License. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MIT License seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Simplified BSD License mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Simplified BSD License yet. Tracking of Simplified BSD License recommendations started around Mar 2021.

MIT License mentions (4)

  • Show HN: Stanchion – Column-oriented tables in SQLite
    Question: Why do you choose LGPL-3.0? For many, of the most attractive features of SQLite is its license (or should I say lack thereof). I realise some people view public domain as legally problematic. I think the best answer for that is public-domain equivalent licenses such as 0BSD [0] or MIT-0 [1] – technically still copyrighted, but effectively not. (There are other, possibly more well-known options such as... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Htmx changes license to Zero-Clause BSD
    There's also another OSI approved "zero" license called MIT-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: Go from Idea to Prototype under 20 seconds
    Probably a MIT-0 header will make people less worried to use the code. Take a look at https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/ https://github.com/aws/mit-0. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Just going to put this here.
    There's even a variant of the license called 'MIT No Attribution License' that has this specific clause removed (just in case you aren't convinced that the clause does cover attribution): https://github.com/aws/mit-0. Source: 10 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Simplified BSD License and MIT License, you can also consider the following products

AGPL - GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.

GPLv2 - Created for the GNU project, the GNU General Public License version 2 is the most popular free software license.

Creative Commons - The Creative Commons is a collection of licenses that allow content creators to adjust the restrictions that they place on their work.

The Unlicense - The Unlicense is a template for disclaiming copyright monopoly interest in software you've written; in other words, it is a template for dedicating your software to the public domain.

Premiumbeat - Premiumbeat.com provides high quality Royalty Free Music.

Free Music Archive - Interactive library of high-quality, legal audio downloads