Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Simplified BSD License VS Creative Commons

Compare Simplified BSD License VS Creative Commons and see what are their differences

Simplified BSD License logo Simplified BSD License

Also known as the "2-clause" BSD license, this is a simplified version of an open source license created at the University of California Berkley.

Creative Commons logo Creative Commons

The Creative Commons is a collection of licenses that allow content creators to adjust the restrictions that they place on their work.
  • Simplified BSD License Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • Creative Commons Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Simplified BSD License features and specs

  • Permissive License
    The Simplified BSD License is permissive, allowing for easy integration into both open source and proprietary software projects without restrictions on distribution.
  • Minimal Restrictions
    It imposes minimal restrictions on how the software can be used, modified, and distributed, which encourages wide adoption and collaboration.
  • Compatibility
    The BSD 2-Clause License is broadly compatible with other licenses, making it easier to combine code with other projects and licenses.
  • Simplicity
    The simplicity of the license's text makes it easy to understand and apply, reducing the barrier for developers to adopt it.
  • Trustworthiness
    As an established and widely recognized license, it is trusted by many in the open source community.

Possible disadvantages of Simplified BSD License

  • Lack of Copyleft Protection
    Unlike copyleft licenses, the BSD 2-Clause License does not require modified versions of the software to distribute their source code, allowing proprietary derivatives.
  • No Patent Grant
    The license does not include an explicit patent grant, which may not protect users from patent claims related to the software.
  • Attribution Requirement
    Although minimal, the requirement to retain the copyright notice and statement of the license might still be considered an unwanted obligation for some users.
  • Potential for License Fragmentation
    The permissive nature of the license can lead to a proliferation of similar, but slightly different licenses, increasing complexity in some ecosystems.

Creative Commons features and specs

  • Flexibility
    Creative Commons licenses offer a range of options that allow creators to specify the permissions for their works, including commercial use, modification, and sharing without alteration.
  • Global Recognition
    Creative Commons licenses are internationally recognized, making them a trusted and widely understood system for sharing creative works across borders.
  • Enhanced Visibility
    By using Creative Commons licenses, creators can potentially reach a wider audience and increase visibility as many people search specifically for CC-licensed materials.
  • Promotes Innovation
    By allowing works to be shared and reused, Creative Commons encourages the development of new ideas and innovations built on existing works.

Possible disadvantages of Creative Commons

  • Misunderstanding Terms
    Users may misinterpret the terms of the licenses, leading to unintended uses that may infringe on the creator's rights or deviate from the intended permissions.
  • Limited Legal Protection
    Creative Commons licenses do not offer as much legal protection as traditional copyright, potentially making it harder for creators to enforce their rights in case of violations.
  • Lack of Compensation
    Creators using non-commercial licenses may struggle to monetize their work, as these licenses allow free use without compensation.
  • Irrevocability
    Once a Creative Commons license is applied, it is irrevocable, meaning creators cannot retract the permissions granted if they change their mind later.

Simplified BSD License videos

No Simplified BSD License videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Creative Commons videos

What are Creative Commons Licenses?

More videos:

  • Review - Can You Monetize Creative Commons YouTube Videos in 2023?
  • Review - Can You Monetize your Creative Commons Youtube Videos?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Simplified BSD License and Creative Commons)
Education
54 54%
46% 46
Productivity
46 46%
54% 54
Calendar And Scheduling
51 51%
49% 49
AI
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Simplified BSD License and Creative Commons. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Creative Commons seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 101 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Simplified BSD License mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Simplified BSD License yet. Tracking of Simplified BSD License recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Creative Commons mentions (101)

  • Get People Interested in Contributing to Your Open Project
    First, when I say open project, I mean, any project released under a license like GPL, any Open Source license, or a Creative Commons license. Not every project involves software development. There are projects that are related to the creation of multimedia content, like images, text, audio or video, and if you want that anyone has access, can redistribute the material or create derivative work, as it happens with... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Source of graphics and sounds
    You can also look for assets under Creative Commons licenses (though you'll need to research the licenses as some require attribution or don't allow use in anything commercial or etc). Source: over 1 year ago
  • Open Sourcing a system of 3d printable files
    You'll need to pick a specific license, not just generic open source. For this kind of thing, the usual recommendation is a creative commons liscence. They have a handy little tool to help you figure out which license is best for you. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Where can I find projects that are 'open source' in a broader sense than just code/programming?
    Regardless, there's a broader "free culture" movement with things like the Creative Commons licenses, etc facilitating a similar approach to other kinds of IP, like movies, music, etc. There are special open source licenses tailored to fonts and a whole ecosystem of open source fonts, for example. Source: about 2 years ago
  • ChatGPT seems to be trained on copyrighted books like Harry Potter
    This is the entire reason the Creative Commons project exists: Copyright law is extremely strict, and CC licenses provide artists with an easy way to be more permissive with the rights to their works, while still being selective about what rights they retain, and while still remaining compliant with copyright law.... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Simplified BSD License and Creative Commons, you can also consider the following products

MIT License - A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

AGPL - GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.

The Unlicense - The Unlicense is a template for disclaiming copyright monopoly interest in software you've written; in other words, it is a template for dedicating your software to the public domain.

GPLv2 - Created for the GNU project, the GNU General Public License version 2 is the most popular free software license.

Open Science Framework - Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.

Pixabay - Over 270,000 free photos, vectors and art illustrations