Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
RXP

SignalR VS ReactXP

Compare SignalR VS ReactXP and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

SignalR logo SignalR

SignalR is a server-side software system designed for writing scalable Internet applications, notably web servers.

ReactXP logo ReactXP

A library for cross-platform development
  • SignalR Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20
  • ReactXP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-25

SignalR features and specs

  • Real-time communication
    SignalR enables real-time web functionality, allowing server-side code to push content to connected clients instantly. This is crucial for applications like live chat, real-time notifications, and live data feeds.
  • Simplified development
    SignalR provides a high-level API that abstracts much of the complexity involved in creating real-time web applications, making the development process easier and more efficient.
  • Automatic Reconnection
    SignalR includes automatic reconnection capabilities, so if a client connection is lost, it can automatically try to re-establish the connection without manual intervention.
  • Cross-platform support
    Being part of the ASP.NET Core suite, SignalR works across different platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing greater flexibility in deployment.
  • Transport fallback
    SignalR supports multiple transport protocols (WebSocket, Server-Sent Events, and Long Polling) and can smoothly fall back to a lesser protocol if the preferred one is not available.
  • Security
    SignalR comes with built-in support for authentication and authorization mechanisms to ensure that only authorized users can connect and communicate through the service.

Possible disadvantages of SignalR

  • Scalability concerns
    While SignalR works well for small to medium applications, scaling to a large number of concurrent connections can require significant investments in infrastructure, such as deploying a SignalR backplane.
  • Performance overhead
    The abstraction provided by SignalR can introduce performance overhead, which may not be suitable for applications demanding high performance and low latency.
  • Limited PaaS support
    Although SignalR can be hosted on various platforms, its integration with some Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings is less mature compared to other technologies designed for real-time communication.
  • Complex deployment
    Setting up a SignalR application, especially with considerations for scaling and high availability, can be complex and require deep knowledge of the underlying infrastructure.
  • Client compatibility
    While SignalR supports multiple clients including JavaScript, .NET, and Java, it may still face compatibility issues with less commonly used technologies or older client systems.
  • Debugging challenges
    Debugging real-time applications built with SignalR can be more challenging compared to traditional web applications due to their asynchronous nature and multiple transport protocols.

ReactXP features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

SignalR videos

+ Add

SignalR Tutorial 1 - What is SignalR?

More videos:

  • Review - SignalR Deep Dive: Building Servers - David Fowler & Damian Edwards
  • Tutorial - SignalR Tutorial 3 - Why Use SignalR?
  • Review - Real-time web applications with ASP.NET Core SignalR

ReactXP videos

+ Add

ReactXP - Super Robot Wars T (NSW/PS4)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SignalR and ReactXP)

SignalR

ReactXP

Developer Tools
87 87%
Developer Tools
13% 13
App Development
100 100%
App Development
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
Mobile Push Messaging
100 100%
Mobile Push Messaging
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SignalR and ReactXP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare SignalR and ReactXP

SignalR Reviews

Essential .NET Core Libraries that Every Programmer should know
You can include it in your code by configuring the SignalR API, which creates remote procedure calls for the server-client architecture. In addition, it manages the communication channel and resources for seamlessly transferring data during high traffic.
Source: positiwise.com
12 Most Preferred latest .NET Libraries of 2022
SignalR offers real-time web integration for .NET core apps through its SignalR .NET core library. Using it, developers can push/add data from the server into their applications. Features: Automatic connection management. Simultaneous message-sending to all clients. Scalable to handle increasing traffic. A group of clients can be notified at once with a message.
Source: www.bigscal.com
SignalR Alternatives
SignalR is basically used to allow connection between client and server or vice-versa. It is a type of bi-directional communication between both the client and server. SignalR is compatible with web sockets and many other connections, which help in the direct push of content over the server. There are many alternatives for signalR that are used, like Firebase, pusher,...
Source: www.educba.com

ReactXP Reviews

We have no reviews of ReactXP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

SignalR might be a bit more popular than ReactXP. We know about 5 links to it since March 2021 and only 4 links to ReactXP. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SignalR mentions (5)

  • Get Started with Serverless Architectures: Top Tools You Need to Know
    Azure Functions integrates with most tools in the Microsoft ecosystem, including Azure Queue (adding messages to a queue) and SignalR (sending real-time updates). This makes Azure Functions the perfect choice for real-time applications like chat apps. Here are the top features:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How can I achieve client-server communication as seamless as Blazor Server for Blazor WebAssembly?
    Blazor Server basically has the server remote control puppet everything on the client through SignalR. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Creating a Lightweight Connection Between C# and Python - Over Internet
    SignalR is a layer over websockets, and is available for python. Source: about 2 years ago
  • I'm new to C#, have a little C++ and Java experience from high school and college. My goal is to make an application for two players to play Go.
    Since Go is a pretty simple game and not very graphic intensive, a simple approach would be to use SignalR on ASP.NET, where the server maintains the game board state and just sends minimal messages (for example, piece X moved to location Y, and whose turn it is now) to each player after their respective move in turn. Source: about 2 years ago
  • .NET Modern Task Scheduler
    SignalR and Pinia for real-time stat updates in the dashboard UI. Source: about 2 years ago

ReactXP mentions (4)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SignalR and ReactXP, you can also consider the following products

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

React Navigation - Description will go into a meta tag in <head />

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

CodePush - CodePush is a cloud service that enables Cordova and React Native developers to deploy mobile app updates directly to their users' devices. 

Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.

Native Navigation - Application and Data, Mobile, and Cross-Platform Mobile Tools

Loading...