Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sidekick Browser VS HTTP

Compare Sidekick Browser VS HTTP and see what are their differences

Sidekick Browser logo Sidekick Browser

The fastest browser for work ever made

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.
  • Sidekick Browser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-24

Sidekick is designed for the ultimate online work experience and brings together every web tool you use. Today, anyone who works in a browser fights to stay organized. Tabs are out of control, browser windows are all over the place, and desktop apps may work on their own, but they don’t integrate well with the rest of your work on the web.

Sidekick changes all of that.

  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

Sidekick Browser features and specs

  • Efficiency Tools
    Sidekick Browser provides built-in task management and productivity tools, such as todo lists and tab management features, which can help boost overall efficiency.
  • Performance
    It is optimized for performance by minimizing resource consumption, making it suitable for users who are multitasking or running multiple tabs.
  • Focus Mode
    The focus mode feature helps users stay concentrated on their tasks by blocking out distractions and unnecessary notifications.
  • Security
    Sidekick Browser emphasizes security with features like ad-blockers and Anti-Phishing measures to protect users while they browse.
  • Integration
    It offers seamless integration with various productivity apps and services like Google Workspace, Trello, and Slack, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • User Interface
    The browser has a modern and user-friendly interface that makes navigation intuitive and straightforward.

Possible disadvantages of Sidekick Browser

  • Compatibility
    Some users may experience compatibility issues with certain websites or extensions that are optimized for more widely used browsers like Chrome or Firefox.
  • Learning Curve
    Users accustomed to traditional browsers might face a learning curve when switching to Sidekick Browser due to its unique features and layout.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to other browsers, Sidekick Browser offers fewer options for customization, which might not satisfy users who prefer a highly personalized browsing experience.
  • Resource Usage
    Although optimized for performance, some users have reported that Sidekick Browser can still consume significant system resources, especially with many extensions or tabs open.
  • Subscription Model
    Some advanced features and tools are locked behind a subscription model, which might be a drawback for users looking for a completely free browsing solution.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with any browser, there may be concerns regarding data privacy and how user information is handled, which users need to consider.

HTTP features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Sidekick Browser

Overall verdict

  • Sidekick Browser is generally considered a good option for users who prioritize efficiency and productivity. Its features cater particularly well to individuals who spend significant time online managing multiple tasks and projects.

Why this product is good

  • Sidekick Browser is designed to enhance productivity by integrating tools like a built-in ad blocker, session manager, and collaboration features, which makes it appealing to users who need to streamline their digital workflows. It is also Chromium-based, providing compatibility with Chrome extensions.

Recommended for

  • Remote workers
  • Project managers
  • Freelancers who juggle multiple clients
  • Tech-savvy users who use numerous web apps
  • Those who appreciate integrated productivity tools

Sidekick Browser videos

Sidekick browser video presentation

HTTP videos

No HTTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sidekick Browser and HTTP)
Web Browsers
90 90%
10% 10
Security
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Sidekick Browser and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Sidekick Browser and HTTP

Sidekick Browser Reviews

  1. Asef Dian
    · CEO at Bitslay ·
    So many bugs to fix

    The idea of a productivity based browser is great but since this browser is still new, it has trouble with a lot of things. Sometimes it doesn't open a new tab when i try, sometimes web apps don't open, and overall its not a smooth experience that i could recommend to people

    🏁 Competitors: Vivaldi, Mozilla Firefox, Brave
    👍 Pros:    Everything you need is in the homepage|Looks really pretty|Focuses on productivity|Has control over ram usage and data|A search option that searches all throughout your history, bookmarks, web and everything
    👎 Cons:    A buggy performance|Short term freezes|Might need some time getting used to the web apps

HTTP Reviews

We have no reviews of HTTP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP should be more popular than Sidekick Browser. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sidekick Browser mentions (3)

HTTP mentions (8)

  • State management in Svelte apps
    HTTP was invented as a stateless protocol, which means that each request fully encapsulates all of the information necessary to return a correct response. So historically, web pages never had to worry about managing state - each request to a URL with parameters or with a form submission would receive a response with all of the HTML that the browser needed to render content. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 3 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sidekick Browser and HTTP, you can also consider the following products

Brave - Fast and secure, ad and tracker blocking browser.

Dat - Real-time replication and versioning for data sets

Google Chrome - Google Chrome is a fast, secure, and free web browser, built for the modern web. Give it a try on your desktop today.

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

Vivaldi - Vivaldi is a free, fast web browser designed for power-users. You decide how you browse. Download Vivaldi's fully customisable browser now and browse your way.

Beaker browser - Beaker is a browser for IPFS and Dat.