Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Shell context menu manager VS CopyQ

Compare Shell context menu manager VS CopyQ and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Shell context menu manager logo Shell context menu manager

Powerful and lightweight context menu manager for Windows File Explorer.

CopyQ logo CopyQ

CopyQ : Clipboard Manager with Advanced Features.
  • Shell context menu manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-27

We recommend LibHunt Shell for discovery and comparisons of trending Shell projects.

  • CopyQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17

Shell context menu manager features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Shell context menu manager provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels to manage their context menu options effectively.
  • Customization Flexibility
    The software allows extensive customization of context menus, enabling users to tailor their right-click options to enhance productivity and workflow efficiency.
  • Supports Windows OS
    It is compatible with Windows operating systems, ensuring that a wide range of users can benefit from its features without worrying about compatibility issues.
  • Resource Efficiency
    The tool operates with minimal system resource usage, which prevents it from slowing down your computer and allows for smooth operation alongside other applications.

Possible disadvantages of Shell context menu manager

  • Limited Platform Support
    The software is restricted to Windows platforms, excluding users who operate on macOS or Linux systems from utilizing its features.
  • Potential for Over-customization
    With extensive customization capabilities, there is a risk of users cluttering their context menu with too many options, which could lead to confusion or reduced productivity.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering the more advanced features and optimizations may require a learning curve, particularly for less tech-savvy individuals.
  • Limited Official Documentation
    The official support and documentation for the software may be limited, potentially leading users to rely on community forums or external guides for troubleshooting and advanced usage tips.

CopyQ features and specs

  • Multi-Platform Support
    CopyQ is available on Windows, Linux, and macOS, offering wide compatibility across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source application, CopyQ is free to use and allows users to modify the source code to fit their needs.
  • Feature-Rich
    CopyQ includes a variety of features such as tabbed items, scripting capabilities, and advanced command-line options, making it versatile for different use cases.
  • Customizable
    The application allows extensive customization of shortcuts, themes, and commands to cater to individual user preferences.
  • Integrated Search
    CopyQ has a powerful search functionality that makes it easy to find specific clipboard items quickly.
  • Item Management
    The software allows users to organize clipboard items into tabs for better management and categorization.
  • Plugins
    CopyQ supports plugins, which extend its functionality and allow integration with other tools and services.

Possible disadvantages of CopyQ

  • Complexity
    The abundance of features and customization options can be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Resource Intensive
    CopyQ can consume a significant amount of system resources, particularly when handling a large number of clipboard items.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the user interface to be less intuitive or dated compared to other clipboard managers.
  • Inconsistent Updates
    While CopyQ is actively maintained, updates and new features may not be as frequent or consistent as some users would prefer.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Advanced configuration options might require technical knowledge, making it less accessible for non-technical users.
  • Lack of Cloud Sync
    CopyQ does not inherently support cloud synchronization, which could be a drawback for users who wish to sync their clipboard data across multiple devices.

Shell context menu manager videos

Mortal Shell Review

More videos:

  • Review - TropicFeel Shell Travel Backpack Review
  • Review - Tropicfeel Shell Travel Backpack Review (2 Weeks of Use)

CopyQ videos

CopyQ text snippet manager

More videos:

  • Review - CopyQ Clipboard Manager
  • Review - CopyQ search your clipboard history and paste from the past

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Shell context menu manager and CopyQ)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Clipboard Manager
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Mac
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Shell context menu manager and CopyQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Shell context menu manager seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Shell context menu manager mentions (24)

  • Thoughts on Windows 11?
    I use the start menu app list and hate how you can’t get that instantly on windows 11 (there’s a button you have to click). I used this program to restore the windows 10 start menu that has been tweaked to look more like windows 11. The only problem I have is that some programs don’t appear. You can still search them, but they aren’t in the list. You could probably drop your own shortcuts in there if it bothers... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Thoughts on Windows 11?
    Just use this Shell from Nilesoft https://nilesoft.org. Runs beautifully and you don’t mess with the registry. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Thoughts on Windows 11?
    I really recommend using this https://nilesoft.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is windows 11 worth it?
    Check out nilesoft shell https://nilesoft.org. It reskins the right click menu to contain all options in a windows 11 style. I use it on all my computers and it works great. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What’s the difference between Windows 10 & 11?
    I’ll one-up your comment: https://nilesoft.org. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

CopyQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CopyQ yet. Tracking of CopyQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Shell context menu manager and CopyQ, you can also consider the following products

CloudFlare - Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.

Ditto - Easy to use interface; Search and paste previous copy entries; Keep multiple computer's clipboards in sync; Data is encrypted when sent over the network; Accessed from tray icon or global hot key; Select entry by double click, enter key or drag drop…

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

Maccy - Lightweight open-source clipboard manager for macOS

Easy Context Menu - Easy Context menu is a Freeware portable utility that includes useful tweaks for the context menus.

Clipy - Clipy is a clipboard extension for macOS.