Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Semantic UI VS Intro.js

Compare Semantic UI VS Intro.js and see what are their differences

UserGuiding
Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Semantic UI logo Semantic UI

A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Intro.js logo Intro.js

Simple Javascript framework for adding screen tips
  • Semantic UI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-20
  • Intro.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

Semantic UI features and specs

  • Intuitive Class Names
    Semantic UI uses human-readable class names that describe their purpose, making it easy to understand and write code without consulting documentation frequently.
  • Customizability
    Semantic UI allows for deep customizability with its theming, letting developers adjust the default designs to match specific project requirements.
  • Comprehensive Components
    Semantic UI provides a wide range of pre-built components like buttons, forms, and modals, which can significantly speed up development time.
  • Flexibility
    The framework offers flexibility in terms of its modular structure, enabling developers to import only the components they need.
  • Detailed Documentation
    Semantic UI has detailed and well-organized documentation, which helps developers quickly resolve issues and understand how to use various features.

Possible disadvantages of Semantic UI

  • Large File Size
    The framework's comprehensive nature can lead to larger file sizes, which might affect the load times of web applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its intuitive naming conventions, the breadth of components and features can result in a steep learning curve for new developers.
  • Community Support
    Unlike more popular frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI has a smaller community, which can mean fewer third-party plugins and community support.
  • Incomplete Integration
    Some integrations with newer JavaScript frameworks such as React or Vue might require extra effort or third-party libraries, given that Semantic UI is not natively designed for them.
  • Infrequent Updates
    The development and updates to Semantic UI have been less frequent compared to other UI frameworks, potentially leading to compatibility and security issues.

Intro.js features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Intro.js provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface for creating guided tours on websites, making it accessible for users with varying technical skills.
  • Customizable
    Intro.js is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the look and feel of the tour to match the existing design of their website.
  • Lightweight
    The library is lightweight, ensuring that adding it to a website does not significantly increase load times or affect performance.
  • Cross-Browser Support
    Intro.js supports all major browsers, ensuring a consistent experience for users regardless of their browser choice.
  • Rich API
    It offers a rich API, enabling developers to integrate the tool into their applications seamlessly and extend its functionality as needed.

Possible disadvantages of Intro.js

  • Limited Interactivity
    While Intro.js provides basic guided tours, it lacks advanced interactive features that might be needed for more complex walkthroughs.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    As a JavaScript library, Intro.js requires users to have JavaScript enabled in their browsers, which might not be the case for all users.
  • Potential for User Overload
    Overusing or poorly implementing Intro.js guides can overwhelm users, leading to reduced engagement or missed information.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Intro.js offers limited features compared to the paid plans, which may restrict use for developers not willing to pay for premium features.
  • Learning Curve
    While it is user-friendly, new users may encounter a learning curve when trying to implement advanced customizations or complex tours.

Analysis of Semantic UI

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Semantic UI is a good choice for developers who prefer a semantic, intuitive approach to building web applications. However, as with any framework, it may not be suitable for every project, particularly those that require lightweight or minimal front-end code.

Why this product is good

  • Semantic UI offers a human-friendly HTML structure, making it easier for developers to read and maintain their code.
  • It provides a wide range of UI components that can be easily customized to fit the design requirements.
  • The framework follows a semantic class naming convention, which enhances the readability and understanding of the code base.
  • Semantic UI has a strong community support and comprehensive documentation, which helps in quickly resolving any development issues.

Recommended for

  • Developers seeking a framework with a strong focus on semantics and clarity in code.
  • Projects that require a wide array of customizable UI components.
  • Teams that value a structured and consistent approach to front-end development.
  • Applications where ease of maintenance and readability of HTML are priorities.

Semantic UI videos

+ Add

Semantic UI In 60 Minutes

Intro.js videos

+ Add

Intro.js: Onboard New Users with a Quick Wizard

More videos:

  • Review - Add a Step-by-Step guide to your Website with intro.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Semantic UI and Intro.js)

Semantic UI

Intro.js

Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
User Engagement
0 0%
User Engagement
100% 100
Developer Tools
94 94%
Developer Tools
6% 6
User Onboarding And Engagement
0 0%
User Onboarding And Engagement
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Semantic UI and Intro.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Semantic UI and Intro.js

Semantic UI Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
I chose Semantic UI because of its intuitive and accessible approach to design. Its use of human-friendly HTML sets it apart from many other frameworks, making it a more natural choice for developers prioritizing user-friendly designs. From my perspective, Semantic UI is the best tool for creating websites and applications that are easy for both developers and end users to...
Source: thectoclub.com
10 Best Free React UI Libraries in 2023
The styling of Semantic UI React is based on the Semantic UI theme and it's also free from jQuery. Apart from that, there are other useful features like augmentation, shorthand props, auto controlled state, etc.
Source: www.wearedevelopers.com
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Semantic UI supports theming and customization, allowing developers to customize the appearance of their UI components to align with their project’s branding. With its intuitive syntax and detailed documentation, Semantic UI is a valuable tool for designing and developing modern web interfaces.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
If you’re just starting out with CSS and UI, go for Tacit, Pure, or Skeleton. However, to build more complex elements, you’ll need a more inclusive framework like Foundation, Tailwind, or Bootstrap. You can get an easy learning curve through Bulma or Semantic UI.
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
If you exclude the fact that Semantic UI doesn’t have the utility classes Bootstrap offers, it is a comprehensive CSS framework that you should try. The best Semantic feature allows you to write HTML code without using BEM methodologies.
Source: www.webdesignerdepot.com

Intro.js Reviews

15 best user onboarding software you need to try in 2023
The free version offers tooltips and screen portion highlights, which might suffice if your app is relatively straightforward. However, Intro.js is designed to be cut and pasted into your app’s code to create onboarding functions it wouldn’t otherwise have. Therefore, you’ll still need to have built a basic onboarding workflow ready.
Source: www.marketermilk.com
8 Best Usetiful Alternatives and Competitors That Are More Professional
The onboarding elements are very limited, so any user onboarding designed with Intro.js will not be likely to satisfy every need of a user.
Source: userguiding.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Semantic UI might be a bit more popular than Intro.js. We know about 19 links to it since March 2021 and only 15 links to Intro.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Semantic UI mentions (19)

  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Semantic UI: A fully semantic front-end development framework. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Ant Design – the second most popular React UI framework
    Semantic UI[1] was one I used to use, both the plain CSS one as well as the React version of the library. Version 3.0 is coming (eventually), which has left it a bit outdated for a while, but it's still a solid UI library imho. I have been switching away to Tailwind. [1]: https://semantic-ui.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: I'm bad at design, which stops me from finishing side projects. Advice?
    What stack are you using? I personally recommend utilizing readily available components: https://ui.shadcn.com/ https://mui.com/ https://semantic-ui.com/ etc.. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • I hate CSS: how can I build UIs?
    Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Software Design Document - Lite
    Honestly you should build a webpage and use a UI library if you want markdown with some extra pop. Check out semantic ui. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Intro.js mentions (15)

  • 7 best product tour JavaScript libraries for frontend apps
    Intro.js is an open source JavaScript library that provides an easy way to create simple and effective product tours. It has an approximate file size of 12.5 KB, so it’s a lightweight library that makes building simple walkthroughs easy: One of the key features of Intro.js is its customizability. It allows you to tailor your tours to align with your application's branding by offering various themes and... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Guided Tours Solution for Your Web Application
    Intro.js like the others offers a rich set of features such as customizable steps and tooltips, keyboard navigation, theming, progress indicators and more. Like others, this library also has extensive documentation. Intro.js has open source licence under AGPL v3 and a commercial licence with different price plans. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Need Help With Website Guide
    Intro.js might be what you’re looking for. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Button pop up with Java and CSS
    Everything in the browser works with just CSS, JavaScript and HTML. There are JavaScript libraries for things like you are describing, if you are able to customize your site with JS - you should be able to use some of them. For example this one: https://introjs.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How come 1 cookie expires and the other one is not?
    For context, I'm using introjs to make a small tour in my website in 2 different pages. I'm making a cookie wheather a user has visited the page so I can only show the tour only once. My issue is that one cookie sets up with an expiration of 400 days as its supposed to be and the other one stays Session only but both are made from the exact same function with the exacth same parameters. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Semantic UI and Intro.js, you can also consider the following products

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

ShepherdJS - Guide your users through a tour of your app.

UIKit - A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces

UserGuiding - Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Appcues - Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.

Loading...