Software Alternatives & Reviews

Seaweed FS VS Quobyte

Compare Seaweed FS VS Quobyte and see what are their differences

Seaweed FS logo Seaweed FS

SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…

Quobyte logo Quobyte

Quobyte is a parallel POSIX file system with block and object storage capabilities.
  • Seaweed FS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-10
  • Quobyte Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-25

Seaweed FS videos

No Seaweed FS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Quobyte videos

How It Works: Quobyte Architecture and Use Cases

More videos:

  • Review - Quobyte - Storage Infrastructure for the Data Center - inovex Meetups

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Seaweed FS and Quobyte)
Cloud Storage
80 80%
20% 20
Storage
64 64%
36% 36
Cloud Computing
76 76%
24% 24
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Seaweed FS and Quobyte. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Seaweed FS and Quobyte

Seaweed FS Reviews

We have no reviews of Seaweed FS yet.
Be the first one to post

Quobyte Reviews

Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
Three key aspects of Quobyte software distinguish it from other offerings. No. 1 is its linear scaling. Doubling the node count doubles the performance, it’s as simple as that. No. 2 is unified storage, which allows multiple users to simultaneously work on the same file regardless of the access protocol being used. No. 3 is the system’s ability to monitor, maintain, and heal...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Seaweed FS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Seaweed FS mentions (36)

  • Ask HN: What distributed file system would you use in 2024?
    What distributed file system would you use for a greenfield homelab project today? Requirements / desires: * Reliable * Performant * Easy to setup and operate Some options: SeaweedFS - https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs 289 hits: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=seaweedfs&sort=byPopularity&type=all JuiceFS - https://github.com/juicedata/juicefs 2047 hits:... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
  • Show HN: OpenSign – The open source alternative to DocuSign
    > Theoretically they could swap with minio but last time we used it it was not a drop-in replacement yet. Depends on whether AGPL v3 works for you or not (or whether you decide to pay them), I guess: https://min.io/pricing I've actually been looking for more open alternatives, but haven't found much. Zenko CloudServer seemed to be somewhat promising, but doesn't seem to be managed very actively:... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • The Tailscale Universal Docker Mod
    Wireguard + GUI: https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy Backups of mail accounts: https://www.offlineimap.org Cloud storage for phones: http://nextcloud.com Mirroring podcasts locally: https://github.com/akhilrex/podgrab My own matrix instance: https://matrix-org.github.io/dendrite/ Backups: https://restic.net Media Management: https://jellyfin.org Relay only tor help: https://www.torproject.org S3 compatible storage:... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Google Cloud Storage FUSE
    JuiceFS is mostly POSIX compatible, but there are important caveats to that like no ACL, copying files changes their mtime (which impacts backup tools), has "close-to-open" consistency (which makes it dangerous for log appenders). Choosing an appropriate solution in this space still depends on what you need to do with the storage, and some options are MooseFS https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs, Curve... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • My Experience Self Hosting
    Supabase-Storage uses an S3 compatible API and is ultimately just middleware for it. So, the redundancy would be at the storage backend systems. Seems like the majority of s3 compatible selfhosted systems are built for redundancy/high-availability. With only a brief read of docs, and in no particular order: Https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/quick-start/ Https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs CEPH... Source: about 1 year ago
View more

Quobyte mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Quobyte yet. Tracking of Quobyte recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Seaweed FS and Quobyte, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

rkt - App Container runtime

BeeGFS -   Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.