Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Seaweed FS VS DiskInternals Linux Reader

Compare Seaweed FS VS DiskInternals Linux Reader and see what are their differences

Seaweed FS logo Seaweed FS

SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…

DiskInternals Linux Reader logo DiskInternals Linux Reader

A freeware tool for extracting files from Ext2/Ext3/Ext4, hfs and ReiserFS partitions in Windows
  • Seaweed FS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-10
  • DiskInternals Linux Reader Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20

Seaweed FS features and specs

  • Scalability
    SeaweedFS is designed to handle a large number of small files, making it highly scalable for extensive data storage needs.
  • High Availability
    The system provides high availability through replication of data across different nodes, ensuring redundancy and reliability.
  • Performance
    Optimized for fast performance with its O(1) disk read result, SeaweedFS can efficiently handle numerous file operations.
  • Cost-Effectiveness
    SeaweedFS uses a distributed architecture that utilizes resources efficiently, potentially reducing costs compared to traditional file systems.
  • Simplicity
    The architecture and design of SeaweedFS are simplistic, which makes deployment and management easier to handle for users.

Possible disadvantages of Seaweed FS

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more mature distributed file systems, SeaweedFS may lack some advanced features that users might need for specific use cases.
  • Community and Support
    Being an open-source project, the level of formal support might not be as comprehensive as commercial offerings which could affect troubleshooting and guidance.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve to understand and effectively implement SeaweedFS since it's different from conventional file systems.
  • Consistency Model
    SeaweedFS follows an eventual consistency model which might not be suitable for applications that require strong consistency.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while available, might not be as exhaustive or detailed as needed by users requiring in-depth technical guidance.

DiskInternals Linux Reader features and specs

  • Free to Use
    DiskInternals Linux Reader is available for free, allowing users to access ext2/ext3/ext4 partitions, ReiserFS, and HFS from Windows without any cost.
  • Cross-Platform File System Access
    The software enables Windows users to access files on Linux file systems (ext, ReiserFS, HFS, HFS+), which is useful for dual-boot users or data recovery scenarios.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Linux Reader features a Windows Explorer-like interface, making it easy for users to navigate and manage files without a steep learning curve.
  • Read-Only Access
    Offers read-only access to Linux partitions, ensuring the data integrity of the Linux file systems while being accessed from Windows.
  • Support for Recovery
    The software can be used to recover files from damaged or inaccessible partitions, providing an additional utility for data recovery.

Possible disadvantages of DiskInternals Linux Reader

  • No Write Access
    Linux Reader does not allow writing to Linux partitions, which means you cannot modify, delete, or add new files directly from Windows.
  • Limited to File Access
    The software is primarily for accessing and reading files, with no advanced features for managing or editing files directly.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Some users may experience compatibility issues with certain file systems or large storage devices, which can limit functionality.
  • No Native Linux Support
    The software is specifically designed for Windows, meaning Linux users do not benefit from this tool natively.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Seaweed FS and DiskInternals Linux Reader)
Cloud Storage
80 80%
20% 20
CD Image Creator
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Storage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Seaweed FS and DiskInternals Linux Reader. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Seaweed FS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 40 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Seaweed FS mentions (40)

  • An Intro to DeepSeek's Distributed File System
    I’m interested in how it is compared to seaweedfs[1], which we use for storing weather data (about 3 PB) for ML training. [1] https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs. - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
  • Apache iceberg the Hadoop of the modern-data-stack?
    Https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs?tab=readme-ov-file#quick-start-seaweedfs-s3-on-aws https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/wiki/Cloud-Tier https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/wiki/Words-from-SeaweedFS-Users ...your true issue is it seems like you're using the filesystem as the "only" storage layer in play, but you also need time and entity querying(!?!). >> we need to be able to query on a per sensor... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • DevOps Isn't Dead, but It's Not in Great Health Either
    > Just have them upload blobs to S3 or Azure Storage. Not everyone can store their data in cloud services, most likely. That said, S3 compatible solutions like MinIO might be a good choice: https://github.com/minio/minio. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • S3 Is Showing Its Age
    > When it gets too out of hand, people will paper it over with a new, simpler abstraction layer, and the process starts again, only with a layer of garbage spaghetti underneath. I'm pretty happy that there are S3 compatible stores that you can host yourself, that aren't insanely complex. MinIO: https://min.io/ SeaweedFS: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs Of course, many will prefer hosted/managed solutions... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Ask HN: What distributed file system would you use in 2024?
    What distributed file system would you use for a greenfield homelab project today? Requirements / desires: * Reliable * Performant * Easy to setup and operate Some options: SeaweedFS - https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs 289 hits: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=seaweedfs&sort=byPopularity&type=all JuiceFS - https://github.com/juicedata/juicefs 2047 hits:... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

DiskInternals Linux Reader mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of DiskInternals Linux Reader yet. Tracking of DiskInternals Linux Reader recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Seaweed FS and DiskInternals Linux Reader, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Ext2Read (Ext2Explore) - Ext2Read is an explorer like utility to explore ext2/ext3/ext4 files. It now supports Linux LVM2.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

HFSExplorer - HFSExplorer is an application that can read Mac-formatted hard disks and disk images. It can read the file systems HFS (Mac OS Standard), HFS+ (Mac OS Extended) and HFSX (Mac OS Extended with case sensitive file names).

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Paragon ExtFS - Provides MacOS and Windows machines native access to the Linux OS ext file system family.